Please forgive me as I may have to edit this post to get the equations to show properly.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

I am doing some work with AC circuits and part of one of my phasor equations has this in it:

[itex] \frac {2i} {1+cos(θ) + i sin(θ)} - i [/itex],

where i is the imaginary number [itex] \sqrt{-1}[/itex].

However, knowing the physics of the circuit tells me the end result should have no complex numbers.

This means "i" should drop out of this part of the equation.

When plugging in values for [itex] \theta [/itex], the i terms do in fact drop out.

By plugging in numbers, I found the result is always of the form:

[itex] \frac{a}{b} ( \frac{ai + b}{b + ai}) [/itex],

where [itex] a = 1 - cos (\theta)[/itex],

and [itex] b = sin (\theta)[/itex].

The portion in the parenthesis, obviously, always equals 1.

This gives me the result:

[itex] \frac {1 - cos (\theta)} {sin (\theta)} [/itex],

which satisfies the requirement of having no imaginary numbers.

Using this in my general equation seems to work as I confirmed with certain specific cases for which the solution was verifiable by other means.

My question, or my request for assistance, is in getting a formal proof that for all angles:

[itex] \frac {2i} {1+cos(θ) + i sin(θ)} - i = \frac {1 - cos (\theta)} {sin (\theta)} [/itex].

I tried using some trig identities and even Euler's identity, but, unfortunately, my trig is a little rusty.

Thank you for your time in advance.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

# Trig identities and complex numbers help.

Know someone interested in this topic? Share a link to this question via email,
Google+,
Twitter, or
Facebook

Have something to add?

- Similar discussions for: Trig identities and complex numbers help.

Loading...

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**