Complexes and Reals: The Impossibility of an Onto Ring Homomorphism

  • Thread starter Thread starter MathMike91
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ring
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

There cannot be an onto ring homomorphism from the complex numbers (C) to the real numbers (R) due to the fundamental properties of these number systems. Specifically, the existence of square roots in C, which is not guaranteed in R, creates a contradiction when attempting to define such a homomorphism. For instance, if f is an onto homomorphism and f(z) = -1 for some z in C, then the square root a of z would lead to f(a)² = f(z) = -1, which is impossible in R. This demonstrates the inherent limitations of mapping C onto R.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of ring theory and homomorphisms
  • Familiarity with complex numbers and their properties
  • Knowledge of real numbers and their limitations regarding square roots
  • Basic mathematical proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ring homomorphisms in abstract algebra
  • Explore the implications of the Fundamental Theorem of Algebra
  • Investigate the structure of fields and their extensions
  • Learn about algebraic closures and their role in complex analysis
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the foundational properties of number systems and their mappings.

MathMike91
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Onto ring homomorphism C-->R

Why can't there be an onto ring homomorphism from the Complexes to the Reals?

The only property of the complexes that the rations don't have that I can think of is the guarantee of square roots- but I can't see how that would interfere with an onto function.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


Let f be an onto homomorphism. Let z be such that f(z)=-1. Consider a such that a²=z, then f(a)²=f(z)=-1. This can't happen...
 

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K