A question about commutative rings and homomorphisms

Artusartos
Messages
236
Reaction score
0
Let R be a commutative ring. Show that the function ε : R[x] → R, defined by
[tex]\epsilon : a_0 + a_1x + a_2x +· · ·+a_n x^n \rightarrow a_0[/tex],
is a homomorphism. Describe ker ε in terms of roots of polynomials.

In order to show that it is a homomorphism, I need to show that ε(1)=1, right?

But [tex]\epsilon(1) = a_0+a_1+...+a_n \not= 1[/tex]

So can anybody help me with this?

Thanks in advance
 
on Phys.org
Hi Artusartos! :smile:

I'm confused :redface:

isn't 1 = 1 + 0x + 0x2 + … + 0xn ? :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Artusartos! :smile:

I'm confused :redface:

isn't 1 = 1 + 0x + 0x2 + … + 0xn ? :confused:

Oh...I thought we had to do it the other way around...

But why do we set [tex]1=a_0 + a_1x + ... + a_nx^n[/tex] and then choose a_0 to be 1 and the rest of the coefficients to be zero? Do we have the freedom to choose the coefficients ourselves?

I thought we were supposed to compute [tex]\epsilon(1)[/tex] and then find the multiplicative identity of [tex]a_0[/tex], and show that their equal? But the multiplicative identity for [tex]a_0[/tex] is 1 and [tex]\epsilon(1) = a_0 + a_1 + ... +a_n \not = 1[/tex]. I must be doing something wrong...
 
You seem to misunderstand the mapping [itex]\varepsilon[/itex]. The mapping is

[tex]\varepsilon( a_0 + a_1X+...+a_nX^n)=a_0[/tex]

For example:

[tex]\varepsilon ( 2 + 3X + 4X^2)=2[/tex]

because [itex]a_0=2,~a_1=3,~a_2=4[/itex].

Other examples:

[tex]\varepsilon ( 3 + 321X)=3[/tex]
[tex]\varepsilon (421)=421[/tex]
[tex]\varepsilon ( 1 + X^2 + 5X^4+6X^{77})=1[/tex]

Does that clear things up for you?
 
micromass said:
You seem to misunderstand the mapping [itex]\varepsilon[/itex]. The mapping is

[tex]\varepsilon( a_0 + a_1X+...+a_nX^n)=a_0[/tex]

For example:

[tex]\varepsilon ( 2 + 3X + 4X^2)=2[/tex]

because [itex]a_0=2,~a_1=3,~a_2=4[/itex].

Other examples:

[tex]\varepsilon ( 3 + 321X)=3[/tex]
[tex]\varepsilon (421)=421[/tex]
[tex]\varepsilon ( 1 + X^2 + 5X^4+6X^{77})=1[/tex]

Does that clear things up for you?

Thanks. I think I understand it now. :)
 
Artusartos said:
… the function ε : R[x] → R, defined by
[tex]\epsilon : a_0 + a_1x + a_2x +· · ·+a_n x^n \rightarrow a_0[/tex] …
Artusartos said:
Do we have the freedom to choose the coefficients ourselves?

ah, the a's aren't constants in the function ε,

they're variables (coordinates) in R …

ε sends the variable point a0 + a11x + a2x +· · ·+a_n xn to the point a0 :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
ah, the a's aren't constants in the function ε,

they're variables (coordinates) in R …

ε sends the variable point a0 + a11x + a2x +· · ·+a_n xn to the point a0 :wink:

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K