A question about commutative rings and homomorphisms

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a function ε defined from the polynomial ring R[x] to the ring R, specifically examining whether ε is a homomorphism and exploring its kernel in relation to polynomial roots.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are attempting to understand the definition of the function ε and its implications for the identity element in the context of homomorphisms. There are questions about the nature of the coefficients in the polynomial and whether they can be freely chosen.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided clarifications regarding the mapping ε and its evaluation on specific polynomial examples. There is an ongoing exploration of the implications of these clarifications on the understanding of the homomorphism property.

Contextual Notes

Participants are grappling with the definitions and properties of the function ε, particularly in relation to the multiplicative identity and the nature of the coefficients in the polynomial expressions.

Artusartos
Messages
236
Reaction score
0
Let R be a commutative ring. Show that the function ε : R[x] → R, defined by
[tex]\epsilon : a_0 + a_1x + a_2x +· · ·+a_n x^n \rightarrow a_0[/tex],
is a homomorphism. Describe ker ε in terms of roots of polynomials.

In order to show that it is a homomorphism, I need to show that ε(1)=1, right?

But [tex]\epsilon(1) = a_0+a_1+...+a_n \not= 1[/tex]

So can anybody help me with this?

Thanks in advance
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Artusartos! :smile:

I'm confused :redface:

isn't 1 = 1 + 0x + 0x2 + … + 0xn ? :confused:
 
tiny-tim said:
Hi Artusartos! :smile:

I'm confused :redface:

isn't 1 = 1 + 0x + 0x2 + … + 0xn ? :confused:

Oh...I thought we had to do it the other way around...

But why do we set [tex]1=a_0 + a_1x + ... + a_nx^n[/tex] and then choose a_0 to be 1 and the rest of the coefficients to be zero? Do we have the freedom to choose the coefficients ourselves?

I thought we were supposed to compute [tex]\epsilon(1)[/tex] and then find the multiplicative identity of [tex]a_0[/tex], and show that their equal? But the multiplicative identity for [tex]a_0[/tex] is 1 and [tex]\epsilon(1) = a_0 + a_1 + ... +a_n \not = 1[/tex]. I must be doing something wrong...
 
You seem to misunderstand the mapping [itex]\varepsilon[/itex]. The mapping is

[tex]\varepsilon( a_0 + a_1X+...+a_nX^n)=a_0[/tex]

For example:

[tex]\varepsilon ( 2 + 3X + 4X^2)=2[/tex]

because [itex]a_0=2,~a_1=3,~a_2=4[/itex].

Other examples:

[tex]\varepsilon ( 3 + 321X)=3[/tex]
[tex]\varepsilon (421)=421[/tex]
[tex]\varepsilon ( 1 + X^2 + 5X^4+6X^{77})=1[/tex]

Does that clear things up for you?
 
micromass said:
You seem to misunderstand the mapping [itex]\varepsilon[/itex]. The mapping is

[tex]\varepsilon( a_0 + a_1X+...+a_nX^n)=a_0[/tex]

For example:

[tex]\varepsilon ( 2 + 3X + 4X^2)=2[/tex]

because [itex]a_0=2,~a_1=3,~a_2=4[/itex].

Other examples:

[tex]\varepsilon ( 3 + 321X)=3[/tex]
[tex]\varepsilon (421)=421[/tex]
[tex]\varepsilon ( 1 + X^2 + 5X^4+6X^{77})=1[/tex]

Does that clear things up for you?

Thanks. I think I understand it now. :)
 
Artusartos said:
… the function ε : R[x] → R, defined by
[tex]\epsilon : a_0 + a_1x + a_2x +· · ·+a_n x^n \rightarrow a_0[/tex] …
Artusartos said:
Do we have the freedom to choose the coefficients ourselves?

ah, the a's aren't constants in the function ε,

they're variables (coordinates) in R …

ε sends the variable point a0 + a11x + a2x +· · ·+a_n xn to the point a0 :wink:
 
tiny-tim said:
ah, the a's aren't constants in the function ε,

they're variables (coordinates) in R …

ε sends the variable point a0 + a11x + a2x +· · ·+a_n xn to the point a0 :wink:

Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K