Components of a covariant vector

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the components of a covariant vector defined in the context of two different basis sets in three-dimensional space, specifically {R}^3. The original poster is tasked with obtaining the components of a covariant vector relative to these bases, but expresses confusion regarding the approach to take.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss computing the covariant vector's components relative to the given basis sets and the relationship defined for the vector. Some express uncertainty about the meaning of the notation and how to apply it in calculations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered guidance on starting points for the calculations, suggesting the evaluation of the vector at the basis elements. Others are seeking clarification on the underlying concepts and notation used in the problem, indicating a mix of understanding and confusion.

Contextual Notes

The original poster mentions needing a simplified explanation and expresses discomfort with the abstract nature of the problem. There is also a request for recommendations on accessible resources or books related to the topic.

roldy
Messages
206
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Consider the following two basis sets (or triads) in [tex]{R}^3[/tex]:

[tex] \{\vec{e}_1, \vec{e}_2, \vec{e}_3\} := \{(1, 0, 0), (0,1, 0), (0, 0, 1)\}[/tex]

[tex] \{\widehat{\vec{e}_1}, \widehat{\vec{e}_2}, \widehat{\vec{e}_3}\} := \{(1, 0, 0), (1,1, 0), (1, 1, 1)\}.[/tex]

Let a covariant vector [tex]\tilde{u}[/tex] be defined by [tex]\tilde{u}(\alpha^i{\vec{e}_i} ):= \alpha^3-\alpha^2[/tex]. Obtain explicitly the components of [tex]\tilde{u}[/tex] relative to the corresponding bases [tex]\{\vec{e}_1, \vec{e}_2, \vec{e}_3\}[/tex] and [tex]\{\widehat{\vec{e}_1}, \widehat{\vec{e}_2}, \widehat{\vec{e}_3}\}[/tex].


Homework Equations


[tex] \tilde{a}(\vec{b})=\tilde{a}(\beta^j\vec{e}_j):=\alpha_j\beta^j[/tex]


The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt at a solution is just me running around in a bunch of directions. I really don't have a clear understanding of how to approach this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Start by computing [tex]\tilde{u}(\vec{e}_j)[/tex] for [tex]j = 1,2,3[/tex]. (These are the components of [tex]\tilde{u}[/tex] relative to the basis [tex]\{\vec{e}_1, \vec{e}_2, \vec{e}_3\}[/tex], or more properly speaking, relative to the corresponding dual basis.)

Then expand the new basis vectors [tex]\widehat{\vec{e}_j}[/tex] in terms of the [tex]\vec{e}_k[/tex], and use that to compute [tex]\tilde{u}(\widehat{\vec{e}_j})[/tex] for [tex]j = 1,2,3[/tex].
 
I'm actually confused at how to do the first part, calculating [tex]\tilde{u}(\vec{e}_j)[/tex].
I know I need to use this relationship [tex]\tilde{u}(\alpha^i{\vec{e}_i} ):= \alpha^3-\alpha^2[/tex].

So expanding the relationship:

[tex] \tilde{u}(\alpha^1\vec{e}_1+\alpha^2\vec{e}_2+\alpha^3\vec{e}_3)=\alpha^3-\alpha^2[/tex]

What does the above actually mean?

I asked my professor about this problem and he helped a little. He actually worked through a portion of it. This is what came about.

[tex] \tilde{u}(\vec{e}_1)=\tilde(u)\left((1)\vec{e}_1+(0)\vec{e}_2+(0)\vec{e}_3\right)=0-0=0[/tex]

The thing I don't understand about this is why are there basis [tex]\vec{e}_1, \vec{e}_2, \vec{e}_3[/tex] in the parenthesis when you are trying to figure out [tex]\tilde{u}(\vec{e}_1)[/tex].

I need a really simplified (dumbed down) explanation on this. I'm not used of working with anything so abstract.

Would you know of any books that are easy on the reader?
 
Does anyone else have insight on this problem?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 42 ·
2
Replies
42
Views
5K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K