Composite function and continuerty

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the continuity of a piecewise-defined function h, which is defined in terms of two continuous functions f and g at a point c in the real numbers. The original poster seeks to establish that if f(c) equals g(c), then h is continuous on R, and questions whether this is equivalent to showing the continuity of the composite function h(c) = g(f(c)).

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definition of the function h and its relationship to the continuity of f and g. There are inquiries about the implications of the equality f(c) = g(c) for the continuity of h, as well as the need for examples to illustrate the concepts involved.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the definition of h and its implications for continuity. Some guidance has been offered regarding the use of the epsilon-delta definition of continuity, but no consensus has been reached on the approach to take.

Contextual Notes

There is a lack of clarity regarding the specific definition of the function h, as well as the conditions under which it is considered continuous. Participants are also discussing the implications of the continuity of f and g on the continuity of h, particularly in the context of piecewise functions.

Mathman23
Messages
248
Reaction score
0
Hello I have the following problem:

Given two function f and g which are continuer on R, and some point c which belongs to R.

I'm suppose to show that if f(c) = g(c), then h is continious on R.

Isn't that the same as showing that that the composite function

h(c) = g(f(c)) is continues on R?

Best Regards,

Fred
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Given two function f and g which are continuer on R, and some point c which belongs to R.

I'm suppose to show that if f(c) = g(c), then h is continious on R.

You haven't told us what "h" is.
 
Muzza said:
You haven't told us what "h" is.

h is definied as follows

<br /> \begin{displaymath}<br /> h(c) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}<br /> f(c) \\<br /> g(c) \\<br /> \end{array} \right.<br /> \end{displaymath}<br />


c \in \mathbb{R} and f and g er continious on R.

Then how do I show that if f(c) = g(c), then h(c) is continious on R?

My own ideer is to show this if f and g are continious on R, then the composite function h is continious on R.

Best Regards

/Fred
 
Last edited:
I'm afraid I have no idea what that means.
 
Okay let's look it at another way,

f and g: [a,b] \rightarrow \mathbb{R} are continious, c \in ]a,b[. Next, let h be

\begin{displaymath}h(x) = \left\{ \begin{array}{ll}f(x) \ \ \ \\g(x) \\\end{array} \right.\end{displaymath}

h is defined on [a,b]

Now my assigment is the following:

a) Let f and g be arbitrary functions. Show that if f(c) = g(c), then the function h is continious. I sure I need to use the epsilon-delta definition of continuerty, but if there is anybody out there who maybe can explain what I need to do by way of an example I would very much appreciate it :-)

b) If f(c) \neq g(c) the h is discontinious. Anybody who can direct me to a good example on how to show this?

Sincerely and God bless You :-)

Fred

/Fred
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K