Composition Factors cyclic IFF finite group soluble

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between cyclic composition factors and soluble groups in group theory. It establishes that if a group's composition factors are cyclic, the group is necessarily soluble due to the existence of a subnormal series with abelian factors. Furthermore, it clarifies that in a solvable group, any refinement of a subnormal series retains abelian properties, leading to the conclusion that the composition series must consist of simple abelian factors, which are cyclic of prime order.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of group theory concepts, specifically composition factors and soluble groups.
  • Familiarity with subnormal series and their properties in group theory.
  • Knowledge of the isomorphism theorem and its implications for group structures.
  • Basic comprehension of abelian groups and their characteristics.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of soluble groups in depth, focusing on their structure and classification.
  • Explore the concept of composition series and their significance in group theory.
  • Learn about the isomorphism theorem and its applications in refining group series.
  • Investigate the relationship between simple groups and abelian groups, particularly in the context of cyclic groups.
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for mathematicians, particularly those specializing in abstract algebra, group theorists, and students seeking to deepen their understanding of the properties of soluble groups and their composition factors.

TaliskerBA
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Hey, just trying to get my head around the logic of this. I can see that if composition factors are cyclic then clearly the group is soluble, since there exists a subnormal series with abelian factors, but I am struggling to see how the converse holds. If a group is soluble, then it has a subnormal series with abelian factors, and if this is already the composition series then given that the factors are both simple and abelian, they are cyclic. But when refining a series and adding in new "terms", why should the new factors be abelian? I know they are simple if they are in the composition series, but just trying to see why it must be that they are abelian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Given a solvable group ##G## and a subnormal series ##\{\,0\,\} =G_0 \triangleleft G_1 \triangleleft \ldots \triangleleft G_n=G## with Abelian factors. Now let's look at a refinement, say ##G_i \triangleleft H \triangleleft G_{i+1}##. Then ##H/G_i## is Abelian as a subgroup of the Abelian group ##G_{i+1}/G_i##. But then by the isomorphism theorem ##G_{i+1}/H \cong \left( G_{i+1}/G_i \right)/\left( H/G_i \right)## is also Abelian. By the main theorem of subnormal series, our given series can be refined to a composition series, which must have simple Abelian factors. But simple and Abelian means cyclic of prime order.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
6K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K