Compositions of measurable mappings

  • Thread starter Thread starter muso07
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Measurable
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that compositions of measurable mappings are measurable. Specifically, if mapping X is F/ℱ measurable and mapping Y is ℱ/ℋ measurable, then the composition Z = Y o X is F/ℋ measurable. The key requirement is to demonstrate that for every measurable set E in Z, the preimage (f o g)^{-1}(E) is measurable in X, leveraging the properties of the individual mappings f and g.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of measurable functions and sigma algebras
  • Familiarity with the concepts of preimages and compositions of functions
  • Knowledge of notation for measurable mappings, such as X^{-1}(ℱ)
  • Basic proficiency in mathematical proofs and logic
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of sigma algebras in measure theory
  • Learn about the concept of measurable functions in detail
  • Explore examples of measurable mappings and their compositions
  • Review the proof techniques used in measure theory, particularly for compositions
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, particularly those studying measure theory, as well as educators and researchers interested in the properties of measurable functions and their applications in analysis.

muso07
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I have to prove that compositions of measurable mappings are measurable.

i.e. If X is F/\widetilde{F} measurable and Y is \widetilde{F}/\widehat{F} measurable, then Z:=YoX:\Omega\rightarrow\widehat{\Omega} is F/\widehat{F} measurable.

Homework Equations


X is F/\widetilde{F} measurable if X^{-1}(\widetilde{F})=(\omega \in \Omega: X(\omega)\in\widetilde{F})\in F}
(that last F is meant to be a curly F, sigma algebra, and the brackets before the little omega and before the last "element of" are meant to be braces.)

The Attempt at a Solution


I know you're not supposed to help if I haven't attempted it, but I've never been great at proofs and honestly don't know where to start. Can anyone give me a nudge in the right direction?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay, so I came up with something that seems wrong, but can someone tell me if it holds?

Z^{-1}(\hat{F})=X^{-1}(Y^{-1}(\hat{F}))
=X^{-1}(({\tilde{\omega}\in\tilde{\Omega}:Y(\tilde{\omega})\in\hat{F}))
=(\omega\in\Omega:X(\omega)\in\tilde{F})\in F
=(\omega\in\Omega:Z(\omega)\in\hat{F})\inF (since Z:YoX)

Again, some of those brackets are meant to be braces...
 
Last edited:
I'm going to relabel the domains as X, Y, Z and the functions f:X -> Y, g:Y -> Z.

You need to show

(f o g):X -> Z

has the property that for every measurable set E in Z, the preimage (f o g)^{-1}(E) is a measurable set in X.

You know this property holds for both f and g (as they are measurable). What remains is show it holds for the composition.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K