Compression of an object under it's own weight.

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the decrease in height of a cube under its own weight, considering factors like mass, Young's modulus, and the normal force. The initial approach assumed deformation occurred before the normal force balanced gravity, leading to a calculated height decrease of 2.27 μm for specific parameters. However, the contributor expresses uncertainty about this method, questioning the role of the normal force and its impact on deformation. They seek clarification on the derivation of the differential force balance equation involving compressive stress and density. The conversation emphasizes the complexity of analyzing material deformation under gravitational forces.
LordGfcd
Messages
11
Reaction score
1
Let's first consider a cube side length a, mass m, Young's modulus of the block is E. How do we calculate the decrease of the height of the center of mass of that cube ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What are your thoughts so far on how to approach this problem?
 
Actually I solved this problem assuming the cube is deform before the normal force make balance with gravity. I eventually find an acceptable result (a=10cm,m=1kg,E=10^7 Pa) : 2,27 μm. But I still think my approaching is wrong because I didn't consider the normal force (action equal minus reaction ofcourse). So I must consider the normal force too, but I don't know how . And, if the normal force balance with gravity, isn't the cube will stop deforming ?
 
The differential force balance on the section of the cube between z and z + ##\Delta z## (z is measured downward from the top) is $$a^2\frac{d\sigma}{dz}=\rho g a^2$$ where A is the cross sectional area, ##\sigma## is the compressive stress, and ##\rho## is the density of the material ##m/(a^2L)##. Do you see how this result is derived?
 
Last edited:
Thank you very much, I was completely wrong with my argument.
 
For simple comparison, I think the same thought process can be followed as a block slides down a hill, - for block down hill, simple starting PE of mgh to final max KE 0.5mv^2 - comparing PE1 to max KE2 would result in finding the work friction did through the process. efficiency is just 100*KE2/PE1. If a mousetrap car travels along a flat surface, a starting PE of 0.5 k th^2 can be measured and maximum velocity of the car can also be measured. If energy efficiency is defined by...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 35 ·
2
Replies
35
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 51 ·
2
Replies
51
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
637
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 60 ·
3
Replies
60
Views
5K
  • · Replies 202 ·
7
Replies
202
Views
13K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K