[Compton scattering] Solving for wavelength

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on solving for the wavelength in Compton scattering, specifically when the recoiled electron's energy is measured at 3 MeV and the scattering angle is 60°. The relevant equations include the Compton wavelength shift formula and energy conservation principles. The final expression derived for wavelength is ##\lambda=-\frac \hbar {4m_ec}\pm \sqrt{(\frac \hbar {4m_ec})^2+\frac {\hbar^2} {2E_em_e}}##, yielding a wavelength of approximately 326 nm. The participant also calculated the incident photon energy to be 2.73 MeV, raising questions about the physical feasibility of the recoiled electron's energy exceeding that of the incident photon.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Compton scattering principles
  • Familiarity with energy conservation in particle physics
  • Knowledge of the Compton wavelength shift formula
  • Proficiency in using LaTeX for scientific notation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Compton wavelength shift formula
  • Learn about energy conservation in elastic and inelastic collisions
  • Explore the implications of relativistic effects in particle interactions
  • Investigate the behavior of photons and electrons in high-energy physics
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those focusing on particle physics, quantum mechanics, and anyone involved in solving problems related to Compton scattering.

Rafiki
Messages
3
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Question: Determine the energy of the incident photon when the recoiled electrons energy is measured to 3 MeV. The angle between the incident photon and the scattered photon is 60°.

Given and knowns:
θ=60° (Angle between incident photon ##\gamma## and scattered photon ##\gamma'##)
Recoiled electron energy ##E_e##= 3MeV
##\hbar## = 6.6261##^{-34}## Js
##m_e##=0.511 ##\frac {MeV} {c^2}## (rest mass for a electron)

Homework Equations


##E_i=E_\gamma+m_ec^2##
##E_f=E_{\gamma'}+E_e##
Compton scattering: ##\lambda'-\lambda=\frac\hbar{m_ec}(1-cos\theta)##
##E_\gamma=\frac {\hbar c} {\lambda}##

The Attempt at a Solution


Starting out with ##cos(60)=\frac 1 {2}## and compton scattering i get
##\lambda'-\lambda= \frac \hbar {2m_ec}## ⇔##\lambda'=\lambda+ \frac \hbar {2m_ec}##
Then ##E_\gamma-E_{\gamma'}=(\gamma-1)m_ec^2## and realize that ##(\gamma-1)m_ec^2=E_e##.
Using ##E_\gamma=\frac {\hbar c} {\lambda}## gives us ##E_e={\hbar c}( \frac 1 {\lambda} - \frac 1 {\lambda'})##.

Now rewrite to ##\frac {E_e} {\hbar c}=( \frac 1 {\lambda} - \frac 1 {\lambda'})## and substitute ##\lambda'=\lambda+ \frac \hbar {2m_ec}## ⇒ ##\frac {E_e} {\hbar c}= \frac 1 {\lambda} - \frac1{\frac \hbar {2m_ec}+\lambda}##.

Solving for ##\lambda## ⇒...⇒ ##\lambda=-\frac \hbar {4m_ec}\pm \sqrt{(\frac \hbar {4m_ec})^2+\frac {\hbar^2} {2E_em_e}}##

Is the final expression correct? Plugging in numbers gives me ##\lambda= 326*10^{-6}## nm which is a much lower/shorter wavelength than i expected it to be.
I asume it is reasonable within the gammaray territory but currently i do not have a feel for what values are reasonable or could be expected, so i am unsure if it is a matter of a error in the algebra, from a physics reasoning standpoint or plugging in numbers.
_______________________________________________________
Also sorry if my solution is a bit difficult to follow, this was my first time ever typing in latex (the guide on this site was extremely helpful and easy to follow though!).

As a bonus question, is it possible to get a () around the "##-##" in ##\pm## using latex?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I redid the algebra and it seems to check out. However i get the incident photons energy to 2.73 MeV, which seems strange to me since the recoiled electrons energy is 3.0 MeV. Meaning that the recoiled electrons energy is higher than the incident photons energy.
Can this occur without the electron having some initial speed? It wasn't specified in the question whether the electron was at rest or moving before the "collision".
 
I had converted poorly from electron volts to joules at one place, which gave me the contradicting numbers. Marking it as solved.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K
Replies
1
Views
10K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K