Compton Scattering and Recoiling Electron Momentum

  • Thread starter Thread starter CoffeeCrow
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Momentum Shift
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on Compton scattering of X-rays with a wavelength of 55 pm from a graphite target, specifically analyzing the wavelength change and recoiling electron momentum. The Compton shift for a scattering angle of 180 degrees is calculated to be 4.85 pm, suggesting a new wavelength of 59.85 pm. However, discrepancies arise as the provided solution states a wavelength of 50.14 pm for the recoiling X-ray, which contradicts the expected increase in wavelength due to energy transfer. The momentum of the recoiling electron is calculated using the formula p = h/λ, yielding values of 2.31E-23 Ns and 2.53E-23 Ns, which do not align with the solution's momentum of 1.32E-23 Ns.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Compton scattering principles
  • Familiarity with the Compton wavelength shift formula: Δλ = h/(mc)(1 - cos(θ))
  • Knowledge of momentum calculations in quantum mechanics
  • Basic understanding of X-ray properties and interactions with matter
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation and implications of the Compton wavelength shift formula
  • Learn about the conservation of momentum in particle collisions
  • Explore the relationship between energy and wavelength in photon interactions
  • Investigate discrepancies in experimental versus theoretical values in Compton scattering
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, particularly those focusing on quantum mechanics and particle physics, as well as researchers analyzing X-ray interactions with matter.

CoffeeCrow
Messages
10
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



X-rays with wavelength 55pm are scattered from a graphite target. Consider an x-ray which is scattered from a valence electron at an angle of 180 degrees (back towards the x-ray source).

a. Is the wavelength of the X-ray greater or less than before the collision?
b. What is the momentum of the recoiling electrons?

Homework Equations



##\Delta\lambda=\frac {h} {mc}(1-cos(\theta))##
##p=\frac {h} {\lambda}##

The Attempt at a Solution



Part a. seems obvious. The X-ray collides with an electron, transfers some kinetic energy to it, losing some energy in the process. Less energy, longer wavelength, right?

Part b however, is giving me a few issues.
I start by finding the Compton shift for 180 degrees, which gives \Delta\lambda=4.85pm.
This means that the scattered X-ray should have a wavelength of 55+4.85=59.85pm, correct?
This is where things get a bit hairy. The solution for this problem however, states that the recoiling X-ray has a wavelength of 50.14 pm. This doesn't seem to make sense, as the energy of the X-ray has increased, despite transferring energy to the electron (these solutions have had issues in the past). Anyway,they then simply use p=\frac{h}{\lambda} to calculate the momentum of the recoiling electron, yielding (with their wavelength), 1.32E-23 Ns.
I however have tried the following:
##p_{i}=p_{f}##
##\frac{h}{\lambda_{i}}=p_{electron}-\frac{h}{\lambda_{f}}##
##p_{electron}=h(\frac{1}{\lambda_{i}}+\frac{1}{\lambda_{f}})##
##p_{electron}=2.31E-23Ns## (using my values for wavelength, 55pm and 59.85pm)
OR:
##p_{electron}=2.53E-23Ns##(using their values)
Which of course, doesn't agree with the solutions.
So, I was wondering, am I missing something fundamental and conceptual in regards to energy and wavelength shift and, is my momentum approach valid?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CoffeeCrow said:
Part a. seems obvious. The X-ray collides with an electron, transfers some kinetic energy to it, losing some energy in the process. Less energy, longer wavelength, right?
Right.
CoffeeCrow said:
This means that the scattered X-ray should have a wavelength of 55+4.85=59.85pm, correct?
I didn't check the number but the approach is right.
50.14 pm is clearly wrong.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: CoffeeCrow
Alright, thanks, I was just worrying I'd managed to miss something fundamental!
 

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
7K