MHB Computation of bond angles and other angles in tetrahedral

AI Thread Summary
The bond angle of 109.5° in tetrahedral molecules like CH4 and NH4+ is derived from the geometric arrangement of points in a tetrahedron. By using vector mathematics, specifically the dot product, the angle between two bonds can be calculated. The coordinates of the tetrahedron's vertices are used to determine the angle, resulting in the formula that yields 109.5°. This method can also be applied to compute other angles in tetrahedral structures. Understanding these calculations is essential for grasping molecular geometry.
WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
376
Reaction score
28
Hello,
I didn't understand the geometry of molecules in which central atom has no lone pairs of electrons. for example, in $CH_4, NH_4^+$ molecular shape is tetrahedral and bond angle is $109.5^\circ$. How is that bond angle computed? $CH_4$ stands for liquid methane and $NH_4^+$ is a polyatomic cation. Now my other question involve mathematics as well.

If i want to compute other angles of this tetrahedral, how can i compute it?

If any member knows the answer to these question, may reply.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Dhamnekar Winod said:
Hello,
I didn't understand the geometry of molecules in which central atom has no lone pairs of electrons. for example, in $CH_4, NH_4^+$ molecular shape is tetrahedral and bond angle is $109.5^\circ$. How is that bond angle computed? $CH_4$ stands for liquid methane and $NH_4^+$ is a polyatomic cation.Now my other question involve mathematics as well.

If i want to compute other angles of this tetrahedral, how can i compute it?

If any member knows the answer to these question, may reply.

Hi,

I got the answer to the question how is $109.5^\circ$ angle between all the bonds in tetrahedral structure computed.
 
Dhamnekar Winod said:
Hi,

I got the answer to the question how is $109.5^\circ$ angle between all the bonds in tetrahedral structure computed.
Here is one way to do it.

First consider that the points (+1,+1,+1), (+1,-1,-1), (-1,+1,-1), (-1,-1,+1) span a regular tetrahedron with its center at the origin.
\begin{tikzpicture}
%preamble \usepackage{tikz-3dplot}
\tdplotsetmaincoords{80}{110}
\begin{scope}[scale=3,tdplot_main_coords]
\coordinate[label=below:O] (O) at (0,0,0);
\coordinate[label=A] (A) at (+1,+1,+1);
\coordinate[label=left:B] (B) at (+1,-1,-1);
\coordinate[label=right:C] (C) at (-1,+1,-1);
\coordinate[label=D] (D) at (-1,-1,+1);

\draw[-latex] (O) -- (1,0,0) node[ left ] {x};
\draw[-latex] (O) -- (0,1,0) node[ right ] {y};
\draw[-latex] (O) -- (0,0,1) node[ above ] {z};

\draw[help lines] (-1,1,1) -- (-1,-1,1) -- (1,-1,1);
\draw[help lines] (1,1,-1) -- (-1,1,-1) -- (-1,1,1) -- (1,1,1);
\draw[help lines] (0,-1,1) -- (0,1,1) -- (0,1,-1);
\draw[help lines] (1,1,1) -- (1,-1,1) -- (1,-1,-1) -- (1,1,-1) -- cycle;
\draw[help lines] (1,-1,0) -- (1,1,0) -- (-1,1,0) (1,0,-1) -- (1,0,1) -- (-1,0,1);
\draw[dotted] (C) -- (D);
\draw[dashed] (O) -- (A);
\draw[dashed] (O) -- (B);
\draw[dashed] (O) -- (C);
\draw[dashed] (O) -- (D);
\draw[thick] (B) -- (C) -- (A) -- (D) -- (B);
\draw[ultra thick] (A) -- (B);
\end{scope}
\end{tikzpicture}

The angle between 2 bonds is $\phi=\angle AOB$.
We can calculate the angle $\phi$ from the definition of the dot product:
\[ \overrightarrow{OA} \cdot \overrightarrow{OB} = OA\cdot OB \cdot \cos\phi \\
\cos\phi = \frac{\overrightarrow{OA} \cdot \overrightarrow{OB}}{OA\cdot OB} = \frac{(+1,+1,+1)\cdot(+1,-1,-1)}{\|(+1,+1,+1)\|\cdot \|(+1,-1,-1)\|} = \frac{-1}{\sqrt 3\cdot \sqrt 3} = -\frac 13 \\
\phi=\arccos\left(-\frac 13\right)\approx 109.5^\circ \]
 
Last edited:
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top