Computing##\displaystyle\int_C f\cdot dr ## for the given vector field

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around evaluating the line integral of a vector field along a specified curve, specifically focusing on the parameterizations of the curves involved and the implications of the integral's sign.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the parameterization of curves C2 and C3, questioning the correctness of the original poster's (OP's) choices. There are attempts to clarify the implications of the integral's negative value and its relation to the direction of the vector field.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on the parameterization of the curves and the interpretation of the integral's sign. Multiple interpretations of the negative result are being explored, with no explicit consensus reached on the deeper implications of the vector field's direction.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted concern about the clarity of the curves' definitions and the assumptions regarding the limits of integration. The discussion also touches on the general properties of line integrals and their interpretations in the context of vector fields.

WMDhamnekar
MHB
Messages
378
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
##f(x,y) =xy^2i + xy^3 j ; ## C: the ploygonal path from (0,0) to (1,0) to (0,1) to (0,0)
Relevant Equations
None
1655964627388.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Please refrain from posting your work as images. Even if legible (which it hardly is on my phone without zooming in) it is impossible to quote properly. Instead use the built-in LaTeX functions and type your work.

That said, you have not specified ##C_3## and your ##C_2## does not correspond to any part of the desired curve.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: WMDhamnekar
The integral for ##C_3## should be zero, still you should 've said that explicitly.

I think your parameterization ##x=t,y=t## for ##C_2## is wrong (according to that parameterization the point (1,1) for t=1 belongs to the path, but we know it does NOT), I think the correct one is ##x=t,y=1-t##.
 
  • Haha
Likes   Reactions: WMDhamnekar
Delta2 said:
I think the correct one is x=t,y=1−t.
This is not correct. Signs matter. OP should be able to deduce the correct path.
 
Orodruin said:
This is not correct. Signs matter. OP should be able to deduce the correct path.
Sorry I don't see a sign error, its the straight line path from (1,0) to (0,1) (t has to vary from 1 to 0 though not from 0 to 1).
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: WMDhamnekar
Delta2 said:
Sorry I don't see a sign error, its the straight line path from (1,0) to (0,1) (t has to vary from 1 to 0 though not from 0 to 1).
OP has all integrals from 0 to 1. Unless explicitly stated that would be the typical assumption.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: Delta2
Write ##C = C_1 \cup C_2 \cup C_3## where C1 is the curve given by x = t, y =0, 0≤t≤1 , C2 is the curve given by x= (1-t), y =t, 0≤ t ≤1, and C3 is the curve given by x=0, y = 1-t, 0≤ t≤ 1. Then,

## \displaystyle\int_C xy^2 dx +xy^3 dy= \displaystyle\int_{C_1} xy^2 dx + xy^3 dy + \displaystyle\int_{C_2}xy^2 dx +xy^3 dy + \displaystyle\int_{C_3}xy^2 dx + xy^3 dy ##

## \displaystyle\int_C xy^2 dx +xy^3 dy = \displaystyle\int_0^1 t(0^2)(1) + t(0^3)(0) dt + \displaystyle\int_0^1(1-t)(t^2)(-1) + (1-t)(t^3)(1) dt + \displaystyle\int_0^1 0 (0^2) 0 + 0(0^3)0dt##

## \displaystyle\int_C xy^2 dx +xy^3 dy = 0 +\displaystyle\int_0^1 -t^2 +2t^3 -t^4 dt +0##

## \displaystyle\int_C xy^2 dx +xy^3 dy = -\frac{t^3}{3} + 2\frac{t^4}{4} - \frac{t^5}{5} \big|_0^1##
## \displaystyle\int_C xy^2 dx +xy^3 dy = -\frac13 +\frac12 -\frac15 =-\frac{1}{30}##

Is this answer correct?
If correct, why is the answer negative? What does this negative answer indicate?
 
Yes it seems correct to me
You should be able to infer what the negative sign means. When does the dot product ##\mathbf{f}\cdot\mathbf{dr}## becomes negative?
 
WMDhamnekar said:
Is this answer correct?
Yes.
WMDhamnekar said:
If correct, why is the answer negative? What does this negative answer indicate?
That you went backwards, in a sense.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WMDhamnekar
  • #10
PS In general ##\int_a^b = -\int_b^a##. And, if the integrand is positive and ##a < b## then ##\int_a^b## is positive.
 
  • #11
@PeroK your interpretation though correct is a bit shallow , there is something a bit more deep relating on how the vector field's direction relates to the direction we walk the path.
 
  • #12
Delta2 said:
@PeroK your interpretation though correct is a bit shallow , there is something a bit more deep relating on how the vector field's direction relates to the direction we transverse the path.
In general, it won't be easy to see whether the answer is positive or negative. But, if you have a positive integrand in the first quadrant, then left to right and upwards is positive; right to left and upwards is negative (what we have here); left to right and downwards is negative; and, right to left and downwards is positive.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: WMDhamnekar
  • #13
PeroK said:
In general, it won't be easy to see whether the answer is positive or negative. But, if you have a positive integrand in the first quadrant, then left to right and upwards is positive; right to left and upwards is negative (what we have here); left to right and downwards is negative; and, right to left and downwards is positive.
I admit you confused me a bit here, but you seem to be thinking in terms of the integral we get after we do the parameterization.

I would say to think in terms of the line integral representing the work of a force.
 
  • Informative
Likes   Reactions: WMDhamnekar
  • #14
It is true that a work integral takes the form of a line integral, but the concept is of course much more general than that. Mathematically, the circulation integral being negative can be roughly interpreted as the field being integrated pointing more against the curve direction than in the curve direction on average. The circulation integral being non-zero also let's us conclude that the field is not conservative (and hence cannot be written as the gradient of a scalar field etc).
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Delta2 and PeroK

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K