Computing the infinitesimal generators for the Mobius transformation

AI Thread Summary
To compute the infinitesimal generators for the Möbius transformation, one must start with the constraint ad-bc=1, which reduces the number of parameters. The transformation can be expressed as t' = t'(t, a, b, c, ...), where a, b, and c are parameters. The generators will be functions rather than matrices, and there should be three generators corresponding to the three independent parameters. The general formula for the generator involves taking partial derivatives of the transformation with respect to each parameter at the identity transformation values. Understanding these steps is crucial for deriving the infinitesimal generators effectively.
platypi
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
The Mobius transformation is $$\frac{at+b}{ct+b},$$ with the constraint ##ad-bc=1##. Find the infinitesimal generators of its Lie algebra.
Relevant Equations
N/A
I don't know where to start. I understand that the constraint ##ad-bc=1## gives us one less parameter since ##d=1+bc/a##. So we can rewrite our original function. I know how to compute the generators of matrix groups but in this case the generators will be functions. I also know there should be three of them since we have three independent parameters. However, I'm not sure what to do. I think we may have to take partial derivatives?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
[ I presume your denominator should be ##ct+d## ? ]

Suppose you have a transformation of the form $$ t' = t'(t,a,b,c,...)~,$$where ##a,b,c## are parameters of the transformation.

The general formula for the generator of such a coordinate transformation is $$X_a ~=~ \left. \frac{\partial t'}{\partial a} \right|_{a,b,c=\text{Id}} \; \frac{\partial}{\partial t}$$and similarly for ##b,c,...##

The "Id" notation denotes whatever value the parameter has at the identity transformation. E.g., in the Mobius case, for ##t' = t## we must have ##a=d=1##, and ##b = c = 0##.
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Help with Time-Independent Perturbation Theory "Good" States Proof'
(Disclaimer: this is not a HW question. I am self-studying, and this felt like the type of question I've seen in this forum. If there is somewhere better for me to share this doubt, please let me know and I'll transfer it right away.) I am currently reviewing Chapter 7 of Introduction to QM by Griffiths. I have been stuck for an hour or so trying to understand the last paragraph of this proof (pls check the attached file). It claims that we can express Ψ_{γ}(0) as a linear combination of...
Back
Top