Conceptual Question on Kinetic Friction

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the relationship between mass and the coefficients of kinetic friction and force of kinetic friction, exploring whether these quantities vary with changes in mass, surface area, or speed.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss their experimental findings regarding the coefficient of kinetic friction and its dependence on mass, with some initially suggesting a decrease in the coefficient with increased mass, while others reconsider and argue that it remains constant. Questions about the independence of the coefficient from factors like speed and surface area are also raised.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants sharing conflicting views based on personal experiments and research. Some have provided guidance on the independence of the coefficient of kinetic friction from mass, while others are still questioning their own conclusions and seeking clarification.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention varying opinions found in educational resources regarding the effects of mass, speed, and surface area on kinetic friction, indicating a lack of consensus in the literature they consulted.

twotaileddemon
Messages
258
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Just wondering.. does the coefficient of kinetic friction and force of kinetic friction vary with mass?

Homework Equations


∑F = mg – Fk = (M + m)a
Fk = ukN
N = mg
uk = [mg – (M + m)a]/Mg


The Attempt at a Solution



I think that as the mass of an object increases, the coefficient of kinetic friction decreases and thus the force of kinetic friction decreases based on the equation Fk = ukN. This is a direct result of my lab experiment. We had a wooden block with some weights (mass M) and a weight attached to a hanger (mass m), which was attached to a string, attached to a pulley and futher attached to the end of a block of wood. We were just testing whether or not the velocity, acceleration, surface area, or mass affects the coefficient/force of kinetic friction. Based on my results, only mass varied.. but I am wondering if my statement in the first sentence is correct. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
actually, now I'm thinking that the force of kinetic friction increases with increased mass. because of Fk = ukN = ukmg... and I also think that the coefficient of kinetic friction is indepent of mass now >_< this contradicts my previous reasoning but I did some research on sites.
 
So could anyone guide me in the right direction if my claims are wrong?
the coefficient of kinetic friction is independent of mass, speed, acceleration, and surface area
the force of kinetic friction is independent of speed, acceleration, and surface area, but is proportional to the mass
 
No the Force of friction increases, as mass increases. F=ma=mg Fk=uN=umg <----look, higher the mass, higher the force of friction becomes, the coefficient does not change, it is different for different material and is therefore have a constant value.
 
My later posts confirms your response, so thank you for helping me with that! Would you happen to know if my other claims in post #3 are correct?
 
Yes, the equation says it all, umg
depends on the material's u, g, and m. so if you have a heavier mass with small u value, ice? So does it depend on the area?
 
I think surface area might affect the force of friction on ice maybe, but certainly not on a hard surface like a table... right?
 
If I am not mistaken following are the findings which some standard textbooks have quoted:
µk, for rigid bodies, depends on the two materials in contact and is independent of mass, m. Therefore, in a given problem fk is proportional to normal reaction (as fk = µkN).
But also, some have quoted that, µk may vary with increasing speed.. but for all practical purposes at this level, it may be taken as a constant.
 
Yeah.. that was a problem I encountered. I must have looked at least 12 different what I consider educational/well-researched sites and some have differences of opinion with velocity, as well as mass (for the coefficient and force of kinetic friction) n_n; .. and even surface area
 
  • #10
yeah right.. and what we do normally use is, Newtonian assumption (for dry friction): µk & fk doesn't depend upon surface area, or speed.. (µk doesn't depend upon even mass) ..but then it is just an assumption.. for we to be able to work easily, and possibly it matches agreeably (although not exactly) with experimental results.
 
Last edited:
  • #11
Thanks for your reinforcements and input.
I've been searching for 6 hours and did an experiment in school several times.. and its driving me crazy xD
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K