Conceptual Question on Parallel Plate Capacitors

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the behavior of two capacitors, C1 and C2, when connected in parallel after being charged to different amounts. The original poster questions the reasoning behind the subtraction of charges in the voltage calculation and seeks clarification on the implications of the capacitors' arrangement.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to understand why the charges are subtracted when calculating the final voltage and questions the reasoning behind the reported positive voltage. Another participant introduces the concept of charge redistribution in the circuit and references conservation of charge.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring the implications of charge conservation and the behavior of capacitors in parallel. Clarifications regarding the circuit's configuration and the resulting voltage are being sought, but no consensus has been reached yet.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of a diagram that illustrates the capacitor arrangement, which may be essential for understanding the problem, but access to the link was initially restricted.

waters
Messages
27
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two capacitors, C1 and C2, are separately charged to 166 C and 348 C, respectively. They are then attached in parallel so that the + plate of one goes to the - plate of the other, and vice versa, as shown on the diagram below (notice how C2 was rotated 180 degrees before the capacitors were connected). C1 has a capacitance of 39.8 F, and C2 has a capacitance of 174 F. What is the final voltage across C1?

http://lon-capa.mines.edu/res/csm/csmphyslib/type56_capacitors/AttachedInParallel.jpg

Homework Equations


V(C1+C2) = Q1 - Q2
V = (Q1-Q2)/(C1+C2)
V = .851 V

The Attempt at a Solution



My question is, why are the charges subtracted? What goes on in this circuit to make that happen? Why does this happen when capacitors are aligned in this manner? Also, why is the final voltage reported as positive, when it should be negative?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
"Authorization Required" to your link.

ehild
 
Sorry about that. It should be fine now.
 

Attachments

  • AttachedInParallel.jpg
    AttachedInParallel.jpg
    8.1 KB · Views: 671
When the capacitors are connected, the "circuit" is really two disconnected halves--a top half and a bottom half. It follows from conservation of charge that on the top half, with AD, you have +Q1 from C1 and -Q2 from C2, and the opposite charge on the BC half. This charge will redistribute itself over the plates so that the new voltages for the capacitors are the same (as is required for a parallel circuit), but the net charge Q1-Q2 cannot change.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 28 ·
Replies
28
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K