Concise and complete textbook on non-relativistic QM

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the search for a concise yet complete textbook on non-relativistic quantum mechanics (QM). Participants highlight Shankar's work for its thoroughness but criticize its verbosity, while Landau's text is noted for being dated and less mathematically rigorous. Ballentine is recognized as the closest match to the desired criteria, despite containing subtle errors in its early chapters. Dirac's "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" is mentioned as a terse and effective resource, with a focus on self-contained explanations that minimize the need for external references.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of non-relativistic quantum mechanics concepts
  • Familiarity with mathematical rigor in physics
  • Knowledge of key quantum mechanics textbooks, including Shankar, Landau, and Ballentine
  • Awareness of common errors in quantum mechanics literature
NEXT STEPS
  • Read "Principles of Quantum Mechanics" by Dirac for a concise overview
  • Examine "Quantum Mechanics: A Modern Development" by Ballentine for a comprehensive yet critical approach
  • Investigate the mathematical foundations of quantum mechanics to enhance understanding
  • Explore reviews and critiques of Griffiths, Scherrer, and Cohen-Tannoudji for comparative analysis
USEFUL FOR

Students and educators in physics, researchers in quantum mechanics, and anyone seeking a thorough understanding of non-relativistic quantum mechanics literature.

v0id
Messages
42
Reaction score
0
I've searched high and low for a terse (yet complete) introduction to the foundations of non-relativistic QM. Shankar is unparalleled in terms of completeness, yet it is infuriatingly verbose. Landau's presentation is a bit dated and difficult to follow in many instances. It is also not as mathematically rigorous as I'd like.

I'd say Ballentine has come closest to satisfying my aforementioned requirements, although it has many subtle errors (at least in its first couple of chapters). Are there any books I've missed in my search?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Dirac's Principles of Quantum Mechanics is terse and good. I'm not sure what you mean by complete.
 
Thanks, I had never heard of Dirac's book until now. By "complete", I mean self-contained, so the reader does not have to refer to external sources due to the author imprecisely glossing over important topics. Landau, Shankar and Ballentine are complete/comprehensive. Griffiths, Scherrer and Cohen-Tannoudji are not.
 

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
1K