Condition for circular-wire polarizer to transmit no light

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the design of a wire grid surface intended to transmit no light, specifically using quarter-circular arc wires. Participants explore the necessary dimensions and geometry of the wires, as well as the implications of wire thickness and gaps between the wires on light transmission and polarization.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • One participant suggests that an arc with a radius equal to the wavelength of incident light may be sufficient for the wire dimensions.
  • Another participant questions the clarity of the original post and asks for clarification regarding the intended outcome, suggesting that the discussion may be conflating transmission with reflection.
  • Some participants argue that a wire will reflect incident light while absorbing a small fraction of its energy, thus transmitting none.
  • There is a challenge regarding the calculations needed for the required thickness of the wire to achieve the claimed behavior, with a mention that wire polarizers work effectively with microwaves.
  • Concerns are raised about the gaps between the wires and their significance in light transmission, with some participants noting that the size of the gaps relative to the wavelength may be crucial.
  • One participant expresses skepticism about the feasibility of using a wire grid as a polarizer at optical wavelengths, suggesting that the concept may be more applicable to microwave components.
  • Another participant notes that a wire alone does not constitute a polarizer and would primarily act as a scatterer.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express multiple competing views regarding the effectiveness of wire grids as polarizers for light, and the discussion remains unresolved with no consensus on the necessary dimensions or the validity of the proposed methods.

Contextual Notes

Participants highlight the importance of considering both the dimensions of the wires and the gaps between them, as well as the differences in behavior between microwave and optical wavelengths. There is also a lack of clarity regarding the definitions of transmission and reflection in the context of the discussion.

Christofer Br
Messages
51
Reaction score
0
I want to make a wire grid surface that transmits no light. For that I wanted to use quarter-circular arc wires. My question is what dimensions would I need to apply to the wires, would an arc with radius = wavelength of incident light be sufficient (since then it is the size of a wavelength in both dimensions) , or do i need a more complicated geometry?
 
Science news on Phys.org
Christofer Br said:
I want to make a wire grid surface that transmits no light.

wire won't transmit light unless it is directly heated or high current through it, till it glows

you then go on to talk about incident light ... did you really mean reflect light ?

your post is a little confusing, would you like to clarify what it is you are really referring to and give some background to what you are trying to achieve

Dave
 
davenn said:
wire won't transmit light unless it is directly heated or high current through it, till it glows

you then go on to talk about incident light ... did you really mean reflect light ?

your post is a little confusing, would you like to clarify what it is you are really referring to and give some background to what you are trying to achieve

Dave
You have mistaken emission with transmission. The wire will reflect incident light, while absorbing a small fraction of it's energy, therefore transmitting none.
 
Christofer Br said:
You have mistaken emission with transmission.

no I haven't

you have mistaken emission for reflection :wink:

emission comes from within, reflection comes from incident EM ( light etc) reflection from surface

Christofer Br said:
The wire will reflect incident light, while absorbing a small fraction of it's energy, therefore transmitting none.

and I seriously doubt the validity of that comment
 
Christofer Br said:
The wire will reflect incident light, while absorbing a small fraction of it's energy, therefore transmitting none.
Have you actually done any calculations about the required thickness of a "wire" that would behave as you claim? Wire polarisers work fine with microwaves.
This thread reads like a re-run of one that ran only a day or two ago. Double posting is not appreciated on PF.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
sophiecentaur said:
Have you actually done any calculations about the required thickness of a "wire" that would behave as you claim? Wire polarisers work fine with microwaves.

uh huh and opaque to light
 
davenn said:
uh huh and opaque to light
What about the gaps in between the wires? A wire polarizer for microwaves is more gap than metal.
davenn said:
uh huh and opaque to light
But the gaps in between the grid?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn
sophiecentaur said:
What about the gaps in between the wires? A wire polarizer for microwaves is more gap than metal.

yeah true , but he's talking about light, not RF ( microwaves) :wink:

sophiecentaur said:
But the gaps in between the grid?

I was referring to the wires being opaque
Christofer Br said:
I want to make a wire grid surface that transmits no light. For that I wanted to use quarter-circular arc wires. My question is what dimensions would I need to apply to the wires, would an arc with radius = wavelength of incident light be sufficient (since then it is the size of a wavelength in both dimensions) , or do i need a more complicated geometry?
unfortunately, he makes no reference to the gaps between the wires, rather only the dimensions of the wires themselves
I, like you, would have thought that it was the size of the gaps relative to the wavelength of the light, that were more important as to if the light would pass through or not

@Andy Resnick , @ZapperZ
or someone else more knowledgeable in optics can help out please ??
Dave
 
davenn said:
I was referring to the wires being opaque
This is turning a bit comedic. A wire on its own doesn't constitute a Polariser. It would just be a scatterer and the scattered EM would have a small polarised component. Is there any reference to this form of polariser that could work at optical wavelengths? I have comment already on the fact that it is essentially a microwave component and there are a lot of octaves needed to get from mm+ wavelengths to hundreds of nanometers.
I don't think the OP has grasped the way a polariser would work and he's just flying a kite. He could look at this link for an idea about a real wire polariser.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: davenn

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K