Condition for Phase transition

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the existence of a phase transition in the 2D Ising model without an external field, utilizing Peierl's argument. The critical condition for phase transition is defined mathematically as the probability ##\mathbb{P}_V^+[\sigma_0 = -1] \leq \frac{1}{2}-\delta##, uniform as the finite subvolume V approaches the infinite lattice ##\mathbb{Z}^2##. The participants confirm that a non-zero average magnetization in the infinite lattice supports the claim of phase transition, highlighting the connection between mathematical rigor and physical examples.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of the 2D Ising model
  • Familiarity with Peierl's argument in statistical mechanics
  • Knowledge of probability theory, specifically related to random variables
  • Basic concepts of magnetization in statistical physics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the mathematical foundations of the 2D Ising model
  • Explore advanced applications of Peierl's argument in phase transitions
  • Investigate the implications of boundary conditions in statistical mechanics
  • Learn about the relationship between magnetization and phase transitions in various models
USEFUL FOR

Researchers, physicists, and students in statistical mechanics, particularly those focusing on phase transitions and the Ising model.

JorisL
Messages
489
Reaction score
189
Hi

I'm trying to use Peierl's argument which in essence is clear to prove that there does exist a phase transition in the 2D Ising model without external field.
The issue I'm having is of a more mathematical nature, in class it was mentioned that there is a phase transition if for some ##\delta > 0##, the probability ##\mathbb{P}_V^+[\sigma_0 = -1] \leq \frac{1}{2}-\delta## uniform as ##V\uparrow\mathbb{Z}^2##.
Let me clarify the notation, we are looking at a finite subvolume V of the square lattice.
The superscript specifies the boundary conditions, all + in this case. And ##\sigma_0## is the state of the site at the origin.

I don't see why this is true, is it because in that case the average magnetisation is non-zero when going to the infinite lattice?
I've been able to follow through the Peierl's argument which is pretty nifty as is, but the sometimes very mathematical approach we used in the course makes it hard to couple back to the examples.

Thanks,

Joris
 
Physics news on Phys.org
JorisL said:
is it because in that case the average magnetisation is non-zero when going to the infinite lattice?

I have confirmed that this exactly justifies the claim.
I hate moments like these when something seems too good/simple to be true.

Joris
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 125 ·
5
Replies
125
Views
20K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
5K