Conditional expectation and variance

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the conditional expectation E(X|Z) and variance V(X|Z) for independent exponential random variables X and Y with means 1 and 2, respectively. The variable Z is defined based on the comparison of X and Y, leading to two cases: Z=1 if X<Y and Z=0 otherwise. The calculations yield E[X|Z=1] = 1/9 and E[X|Z=0] = 8/9, resulting in an overall expectation E(X) = 17/27, which contradicts the known mean of X. Participants are questioning the computation of probabilities Pr{Z=0} and Pr{Z=1} to identify the source of the error.
covariance64
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Let X, Y be independent exponential random variables with means 1 and 2 respectively.

Let
Z = 1, if X < Y
Z = 0, otherwise

Find E(X|Z) and V(X|Z).

We should first find E(X|Z=z)
E(X|Z=z) = integral (from 0 to inf) of xf(x|z).
However, how do we find f(x|z) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Z is discrete. Since E[.|Z] and V[.|Z] are functions of Z, they too are discrete.

E[X|Z=1] = E[X|X<Y].
E[X|Z=0] = E[X|X>Y].

Similarly for V[X|Z].
 
I have found that

E[X|Z=1] = E[X|X<Y] = 1/9
E[X|Z=0] = E[X|X>Y] = 8/9
by integrating, and conditioning on the random variable Y.

So E(X) = E(E(X|Z)) = (1/9)(1/3) + (8/9)(2/3) = 17/27,

which contradicts the fact that E(X) = 1, for X exponential with mean 1.

I am wondering where is the error.
 
How are you computing Pr{Z=0} and Pr{Z=1}?
 
I was reading a Bachelor thesis on Peano Arithmetic (PA). PA has the following axioms (not including the induction schema): $$\begin{align} & (A1) ~~~~ \forall x \neg (x + 1 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A2) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + 1 =y + 1 \to x = y) \nonumber \\ & (A3) ~~~~ \forall x (x + 0 = x) \nonumber \\ & (A4) ~~~~ \forall xy (x + (y +1) = (x + y ) + 1) \nonumber \\ & (A5) ~~~~ \forall x (x \cdot 0 = 0) \nonumber \\ & (A6) ~~~~ \forall xy (x \cdot (y + 1) = (x \cdot y) + x) \nonumber...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
Back
Top