Conduction and lossless materials

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers around the concepts of conductivity, lossless materials, and the behavior of electric fields and electromagnetic waves in different media. Participants explore the implications of zero conductivity, the relationship between conductivity and attenuation constants, and the nature of energy loss in conductive versus insulative materials.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants assert that zero conductivity indicates a lossless medium, leading to the propagation of electric fields without energy loss.
  • Others argue that while zero conductivity implies infinite resistance and no electron flow, the attenuation constant is not necessarily zero, with some suggesting it is very small at low frequencies.
  • One participant notes that good conductors have high conductivity and therefore high loss, which seems counterintuitive as they expect low loss with easy electron flow.
  • Another participant explains that loss in conductive materials relates to field strength rather than resistive losses from current flow, presenting a distinction between perfect conductors, perfect insulators, and real-world conductors.
  • There is a discussion about the rapid attenuation of electric fields in good conductors due to the movement of electrons that neutralize the field, leading to high attenuation constants.
  • A participant expresses a desire for a more intuitive understanding of electromagnetic theory and its implications for energy loss in various materials.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the relationship between conductivity, attenuation constants, and energy loss. There is no consensus on the exact nature of these relationships, and the discussion remains unresolved regarding the implications of zero conductivity and the behavior of electric fields in conductive materials.

Contextual Notes

Some statements rely on specific definitions of terms like "lossless" and "attenuation constant," which may not be universally agreed upon. The discussion also touches on the complexities of electromagnetic theory without fully resolving the mathematical underpinnings involved.

littlebilly91
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Ok, I am looking over stuff for an exam. I am a bit confused on something. When conductivity is zero, a medium is lossless. Zero conductivity means infinite resistance. For infinite resistance, no electrons will flow, but an electric field can propagate forever. A wire has high conductivity, so electrons can flow easily. I understand the difference between electrons and electric fields, but this seems counter-intuitive. Also, when conductivity is zero, the attenuation constant is not zero, though it is very small for small frequencies. Is everything here correct or am I overlooking something?
Thank you,
Chet
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
littlebilly91 said:
Ok, I am looking over stuff for an exam. I am a bit confused on something. When conductivity is zero, a medium is lossless.Correct

Zero conductivity means infinite resistance. For infinite resistance, no electrons will flow, but an electric field can propagate forever.Correct

A wire has high conductivity, so electrons can flow easily. I understand the difference between electrons and electric fields, but this seems counter-intuitive. Also, when conductivity is zero, the attenuation constant is not zero,No, when conductivity is zero, attenuation constant is zero. though it is very small for small frequencies. Is everything here correct or am I overlooking something?
Thank you,
Chet

Because good conductor like metal can conduct current, conductivity is high. loss is very high, therefore attenuation constant is very high and EM wave get attenuated when going into the good conductor.

There is almost no material that is truly lossless, just matter how low the loss. If there is a true lossless material, attenuation constant is zero. Good luck in finding one other than vacuum....well air maybe be consider lossless too!
 
Ok, cool. The only issue I have is why does conductive material have high loss? When electrons can easily flow, I would expect loss to be low.
 
Explanation is actually not easy, it is all electromagnetics theory of EM wave in various medium where charge free wave equation:

\nabla^2\tilde E -\delta^2\tilde E=0\;\hbox { where } \;\delta=\alpha +j\beta = j\omega\sqrt{\mu \epsilon_0\epsilon_r}\;\sqrt{1-j\frac{\sigma}{\omega\epsilon_0\epsilon_r}}\;\hbox { which } \alpha \;\hbox { is attenuation constant and }\;\beta \;\hbox { is the phase constant}.

Where the solution is a pair of phasor equations.

\tilde E(z)=Ae^{\delta z}+Be^{-\delta z}

For good conductor:

\sigma=\infty\;\Rightarrow \alpha=\beta=\sqrt{\pi f \mu\sigma}

I skip a lot of steps to arrive to this, if you are interested, I can post the derivation in detail. But from this, you can see as conductance goes up, attenuation constant goes up so EM wave disappeared quickly when penetrating into a good conductor. Also, the velocity of the EM propagation slow down quite a bit as conductance goes up.

I still yet to find a lot of the EM theory intuitive! If someone has a more common sense explanation, I love to learn myself.
 
Last edited:
littlebilly91 said:
Ok, cool. The only issue I have is why does conductive material have high loss? When electrons can easily flow, I would expect loss to be low.

The simple explanation I used to pass the tests in school is that the loss here is in terms of field strength. You may be confusing this with resistive losses from current flow.

Perfect conductor - zero field and high field loss, but no energy loss

Perfect insulator - infinite field and low field loss, but no energy loss

Real conductors and RLC components - somewhere in between with energy loss from heating.

It may not be perfectly accurate, but I've never worked with a perfect conductor or insulator since school. :confused:
 
NUCENG said:
The simple explanation I used to pass the tests in school is that the loss here is in terms of field strength. You may be confusing this with resistive losses from current flow.

Perfect conductor - zero field and high field loss, but no energy loss

Perfect insulator - infinite field and low field loss, but no energy loss

Real conductors and RLC components - somewhere in between with energy loss from heating.

It may not be perfectly accurate, but I've never worked with a perfect conductor or insulator since school. :confused:

Oh yeh, I remember now. It is from early chapters in EM book. For good conductor, you cannot have E inside as any E developed inside a good conductor will cause electrons to move in direction so it neutralize the field. So the E disappeared real fast in good conductor and therefore the attenuation constant is very high.

I never link this together till now. Thanks for reminding me this.

To the OP, this is the simple answer. E decrease very fast in good conductors because electrons can move freely in good conductor. Any E developed inside a good conductor will immediately cause electrons to move in direction that will neutralize the E field. So the E will greatly attenuated fast. For perfect conductor, no E field can even develop inside and therefore the skin depth is zero and all current are on the surface.
 
Last edited:
Ahhh... That makes sense. In lossless media, no electrons move, so the E field never looses energy. E&M is so cool. Thank you both for your responses!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
438
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
721
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K