Conductors with off-centered cavity

  • Thread starter Thread starter raging
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Cavity Conductors
AI Thread Summary
In an uncharged solid spherical conductor with an off-center cavity, placing a charge inside the cavity leads to an electric field outside the conductor that behaves as if the conductor were a charged sphere. Gauss's law can be applied to demonstrate that the electric field outside is determined solely by the total charge enclosed, regardless of the cavity's position or shape. The induced charges on the inner surface of the cavity balance the charge placed inside, while the outer surface of the conductor acquires a corresponding charge to maintain overall neutrality. This results in an electric field that is uniform and can be expressed as if the charge were at the center of a spherical conductor. Ultimately, the internal configuration does not affect the external electric field, confirming the uniqueness of the potential outside the sphere.
raging
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Suppose we had an uncharged solid spherical conductor with radius R, and some spherical cavity of radius a that is located b units above R, where a+b<R. If we place a charge inside the cavity at the center, how would you quantitatively express the E-field lines outside of the conductor?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This is NOT a homework. Concentric cavities are too easy. I'm wondering if we can somehow apply uniqueness here to show that it actually doesn't matter where the cavity is...
 
The E field is easy to find using Gauss's law . And it doesn't matter where the charge is inside the sphere or the shape of the cavity.
 
cragar said:
The E field is easy to find using Gauss's law . And it doesn't matter where the charge is inside the sphere or the shape of the cavity.
Exactly. You can kind of reason it out in a way, by knowing that charges like to stay on the very outside of a conductor. Think about it, say you've got a positive charge inside that off-centre cavity. That charge is going to pull negative charges towards the inner surface of that cavity to balance it out. Then, to balance out those negative charges in the conductor, positive charges are going to show up on the outside of the sphere (regardless of where the cavity is), and they'll create an electric field outside the sphere exactly the same as if you had just a charged sphere.

You can use Gauss' Law to prove every part of that by setting up surfaces just outside the cavity and just outside the sphere and using the relation:

\Phi_E = \int\vec{E}\cdot d\vec{A} = \frac{q_{enclosed}}{\epsilon_0}

Where you know \vec{E} = 0 inside the conductor.
 
True. But to solve that surface integral simply one must apply a symmetry argument. How do you arrive about that symmetry? The induced charge will not be evenly distributed on the outside of the sphere, but is there a way to apply uniqueness to arguing that?
 
The outer surface of the conductor will be an equipotential surface of radius R. An outside potential phi=Q/r satisfies this boundary condition. It is thus the unique potential outside the sphere.
It doesn't matter what goes on in cavities within the conduciting sphere.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top