Does Including Excited States Improve Accuracy in Configuration Interaction?

Click For Summary
Including excited states in the Configuration Interaction (CI) scheme enhances accuracy by allowing for a broader range of possible solutions compared to the Hartree-Fock model, which restricts molecular orbitals to full occupancy. This broader basis set accounts for partial occupancy of orbitals, enabling the CI wavefunction to minimize energy more effectively. The discussion clarifies that the Born-Oppenheimer approximation, which separates nuclear and electronic motion, is not directly related to CI's accuracy improvements. For a deeper understanding of these concepts, the reference to "Modern Quantum Chemistry" by A. Szabo and N.S. Ostlund is suggested. Overall, incorporating excited states in CI leads to a more accurate representation of molecular systems.
raman
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
In Configuration Interaction scheme Why does inclusion of excited states
(unfilled states) in the basis set improve accuracy? What is missing in the model which is accounted for by inclusion of suc h virtual states. My guess is the the born-oppenheimer approximation but not sure??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
CI spans a larger space of possible solutions than Hartree-Fock alone. A CI wavefunction may be interpreted to include partial occupancy of orbitals unfilled in the Hartree-Fock model where all MO's are constrained to have 1 or 2 electrons. The occupancy of such orbitals is chosen to give the lowest possible energy.
The Born-Oppenheimer approximation has nothing to do with CI. It allows one to decouple nuclear motion from that of the electrons. This leads to a simple 1/r description of nuclear-electron attractions.
Since you've asked several questions on this topic, I suggest you have a look at: "Modern Quantum Chemistry" by A. Szabo and N.S. Ostlund.
-Jim
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 72 ·
3
Replies
72
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 94 ·
4
Replies
94
Views
27K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K