Confirming divergence theorm example

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter namu
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Divergence Example
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on confirming the divergence theorem using the vector field \(\vec{F} = x\hat{i} + y\hat{j} - z\hat{k}\) over a closed cone defined by \(x^2 + y^2 = z^2\) for \(0 \leq z \leq 1\). The divergence of the vector field is calculated as \(\nabla \cdot \vec{F} = 1\), leading to a volume integral result of \(\frac{\pi}{3}\). The user initially miscalculated the flux integral over the cone surface \(S_1\), which was corrected by redefining the normal vector, ultimately confirming that the correct flux is \(\frac{4\pi}{3}\).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector calculus, specifically the divergence theorem
  • Familiarity with surface integrals and normal vectors
  • Knowledge of cylindrical coordinates for volume integration
  • Proficiency in computing flux integrals over surfaces
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the divergence theorem in detail, focusing on applications in vector fields
  • Learn how to compute normal vectors for surfaces defined by implicit functions
  • Explore cylindrical coordinates and their use in volume integrals
  • Practice solving flux integrals for various vector fields and surfaces
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in mathematics, physics, and engineering who are working with vector calculus and need to understand the application of the divergence theorem in practical scenarios.

namu
Messages
32
Reaction score
0
Hello, I am having trouble confirming that the flux integral is equal to the divergence over a volume. I am making a silly mistake & its just one of those days that I can't eyeball it. Here is the problem.

I want to compute the flux integral for

<br /> \vec{ F}=x\hat i+y\hat j-z\hat k<br />

out of the closed cone

<br /> x^2+y^2=z^2 \,\,\,\,\,\,\,0\leq z\leq1<br />

Let us first do this the easy way using the divergence theorem.

<br /> \int\int \vec F \cdot d \textbf{S}=\int \int \int \nabla \cdot \vec F dV <br />

<br /> \nabla \cdot \vec F=1<br />

<br /> \int \int \int \nabla \cdot \vec F dV=\int_0^{2\pi} d\theta \int_0^1 r dr \int_r^1 dz=\frac{\pi}{3}<br />

This agrees with the formula for the volume of a cone of radius one and height one. Now, let us apply the flux integral directly.

First let's look at the cone.

<br /> \int\int \vec F \cdot d \textbf{S}=\int\int \vec F \cdot d \textbf{S}_1+\int\int \vec F \cdot d \textbf{S}_2<br />

where S1 is the cone and S2 is the lid of the cone, namely the unit disk z=1.

<br /> f=x^2+y^2-z^2=0<br />

<br /> \nabla f=(2x,2y,-2z)<br />

<br /> \hat n=\frac{\nabla f}{|\nabla f|}=\frac{(2x,2y,-2z)}{2 \sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2}}=\frac{(2x,2y,-2z)}{2 \sqrt{2}z}<br />

<br /> d\textbf{S}_1=\hat n \sqrt{\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}^2+\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}^2+\frac{\partial f}{\partial z}^2} dx dy=\hat n 2 \sqrt{x^2+y^2+z^2} dx dy= \hat n 2 \sqrt{2}z dx dy =(2x,2y,-2z)dx dy<br />

<br /> \int\int \vec F \cdot d \textbf{S}_1=\int\int \vec F \cdot (2x,2y,-2z)dx dy=\int\int 2x^2+2y^2+2z^2 dx dy =\int\int 4x^2+4y^2 dx dy=\int_0^{2\pi}d\theta \int_0^1 r dr 4 r^2=2\pi<br />

Over the disk \hat n=\hat k and z=1

<br /> \int\int \vec F \cdot d \textbf{S}_2=-\int_0^{2\pi}d\theta\int_0^1 r dr =-\pi<br />

Hence,

<br /> 2\pi-\pi=\pi <br />

So this is the wrong answer. I don't see where I went wrong. Can someone please help? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You applied the divergence theorem correctly. The flux over the circle is also correct.
The mistake you made is when you computed the flux over S1: the cone. To define
the normal for z=f(x,y) first write it in a format as follows:
\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}-z=0 Then the normal N will be
N=&lt;\frac{x}{z},\frac{y}{z},-1&gt; From here you can do the work and show
that the flux you get will be \frac{4\pi}{3} This will confirm the divergence
theorem. Let me know if this makes sense or if you have any further questions.
 
abiyo said:
You applied the divergence theorem correctly. The flux over the circle is also correct.
The mistake you made is when you computed the flux over S1: the cone. To define
the normal for z=f(x,y) first write it in a format as follows:
\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}}-z=0 Then the normal N will be
N=&lt;\frac{x}{z},\frac{y}{z},-1&gt; From here you can do the work and show
that the flux you get will be \frac{4\pi}{3} This will confirm the divergence
theorem. Let me know if this makes sense or if you have any further questions.

I worked it out and I got the correct answer. Thank you!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K