I Confused about applying the Euler–Lagrange equation

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation of motion from a Lagrangian of the form L = (mv^2)/2 + f(v)v, where f(v) is a velocity-dependent function. The key question is about the correct expression for ∂L/∂v, with initial confusion between two forms. The correct expression is clarified to be mv + f(v) + f'(v)v, emphasizing the need for ordinary derivatives rather than partial derivatives in this context. Additionally, participants suggest rewriting the Lagrangian using g(v) = f(v)v to simplify the analysis. The conversation highlights the importance of proper notation and understanding of derivatives in Lagrangian mechanics.
Malamala
Messages
345
Reaction score
28
Hello! I have a Lagrangian of the form:

$$L = \frac{mv^2}{2}+f(v)v$$
where ##f(v)## is a function of the velocity. I would like to derive the equation of motion in general, without writing down an expression for ##f(v)## yet. I have that ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 0##. However, what is ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial v}##? Is it ##mv+f(v)## or ##mv+f(v)+\frac{\partial f}{v}v##? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you meant ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial v}##.

For the purpose of experiment, assume ##f(v)=\alpha v## where ##\alpha## is a constant with appropriate units (or you may assume something else simple if you prefer). You can now calculate your Lagrangian explicitly. Which of your approaches gives the right answer in that case?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and TSny
Malamala said:
However, what is ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial v}##? Is it ##mv+f(v)## or ##mv+f(v)+\frac{\partial f}{v}v##?
It is essentially the second expression. But the notation is a bit off in the last term where you wrote ##\frac{\partial f}{v}v##. A partial derivative should have the symbol ##\partial## in both the numerator and denominator: ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial v}##. However, note that ##f(v)## is a function of the single variable ##v##. So, a partial derivative is not really appropriate. Instead, the notation should express an ordinary derivative ##\frac{df}{dv}## or ##f'(v)##. Thus, the last term would be ##f'(v)v##.

I assume that you are dealing with a one-dimensional problem with spatial coordinate ##x## and where ##v = \frac{dx}{dt}##.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Ibix
Malamala said:
Hello! I have a Lagrangian of the form:

$$L = \frac{mv^2}{2}+f(v)v$$
where ##f(v)## is a function of the velocity. I would like to derive the equation of motion in general, without writing down an expression for ##f(v)## yet. I have that ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 0##. However, what is ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial v}##? Is it ##mv+f(v)## or ##mv+f(v)+\frac{\partial f}{v}v##? Thank you!
Let ##g(v) = f(v)v##. Rewrite your Lagrangian using ##g(v)##. What do you do now that the lone ##v## has gone?
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top