Undergrad Confused about applying the Euler–Lagrange equation

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the equation of motion from a Lagrangian of the form L = (mv^2)/2 + f(v)v, where f(v) is a velocity-dependent function. The key question is about the correct expression for ∂L/∂v, with initial confusion between two forms. The correct expression is clarified to be mv + f(v) + f'(v)v, emphasizing the need for ordinary derivatives rather than partial derivatives in this context. Additionally, participants suggest rewriting the Lagrangian using g(v) = f(v)v to simplify the analysis. The conversation highlights the importance of proper notation and understanding of derivatives in Lagrangian mechanics.
Malamala
Messages
348
Reaction score
28
Hello! I have a Lagrangian of the form:

$$L = \frac{mv^2}{2}+f(v)v$$
where ##f(v)## is a function of the velocity. I would like to derive the equation of motion in general, without writing down an expression for ##f(v)## yet. I have that ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 0##. However, what is ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial v}##? Is it ##mv+f(v)## or ##mv+f(v)+\frac{\partial f}{v}v##? Thank you!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I guess you meant ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial v}##.

For the purpose of experiment, assume ##f(v)=\alpha v## where ##\alpha## is a constant with appropriate units (or you may assume something else simple if you prefer). You can now calculate your Lagrangian explicitly. Which of your approaches gives the right answer in that case?
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and TSny
Malamala said:
However, what is ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial v}##? Is it ##mv+f(v)## or ##mv+f(v)+\frac{\partial f}{v}v##?
It is essentially the second expression. But the notation is a bit off in the last term where you wrote ##\frac{\partial f}{v}v##. A partial derivative should have the symbol ##\partial## in both the numerator and denominator: ##\frac{\partial f}{\partial v}##. However, note that ##f(v)## is a function of the single variable ##v##. So, a partial derivative is not really appropriate. Instead, the notation should express an ordinary derivative ##\frac{df}{dv}## or ##f'(v)##. Thus, the last term would be ##f'(v)v##.

I assume that you are dealing with a one-dimensional problem with spatial coordinate ##x## and where ##v = \frac{dx}{dt}##.
 
  • Like
Likes vanhees71 and Ibix
Malamala said:
Hello! I have a Lagrangian of the form:

$$L = \frac{mv^2}{2}+f(v)v$$
where ##f(v)## is a function of the velocity. I would like to derive the equation of motion in general, without writing down an expression for ##f(v)## yet. I have that ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial x} = 0##. However, what is ##\frac{\partial L}{\partial v}##? Is it ##mv+f(v)## or ##mv+f(v)+\frac{\partial f}{v}v##? Thank you!
Let ##g(v) = f(v)v##. Rewrite your Lagrangian using ##g(v)##. What do you do now that the lone ##v## has gone?
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
683
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
860
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
467