A Confused about selection rules in optical transitions

  • A
  • Thread starter Thread starter Malamala
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Optical
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on the selection rules for optical transitions in ions within a crystal, specifically regarding a paper that reports transitions between electronic levels with significant differences in their quantum numbers. The observed transitions involve a change in total angular momentum, ΔJ = 3, and a change in magnetic quantum number, ΔMJ = 7, raising questions about their feasibility given the expected selection rules. Although J and MJ are affected by the crystal field, they are still considered good quantum numbers, leading to confusion about how such transitions can occur. The author speculates that the paper's focus on weak axion signals may influence their choice of transitions, despite the apparent contradiction with expected selection rules. The discussion highlights the complexities of quantum state mixing and the implications for experimental observations in this context.
Malamala
Messages
347
Reaction score
28
Hello! This question is motivated by this paper in particular (let me know if it is not open access). They measure transitions between electronic levels inside an ion, placed inside a crystal. In Fig. 2, they show measured transitions between 2 electronic levels, one of them having ##J = 15/2## and ##M_J=\pm 5/2## while the other one has ##J = 9/2## and ##M_J=\pm 9/2## which means that the transitions have ##\Delta J = 3## and, for the largest difference, ##\Delta M_J = 9/2 - (-5/2) = 7##. How is this possible? I understand that, ##J## and ##M_J## are not perfectly good quantum numbers due to the crystal field, but they are still quite good to a certain degree. Also, even if there is some mixing of other electronic states with different ##J## and ##M_J## values, I wouldn't expected states with so different quantum numbers to have a significant contribution to the mixing. Given that the paper claims to search for very weak axion signals, I assume the strategy is not to use highly forbidden transitions, on top of the fact that the signal sought for is very weak (but anyway, they seem to be able to easily excite these transitions with a normal laser). What am I missing here? Thank you!
 
From the BCS theory of superconductivity is well known that the superfluid density smoothly decreases with increasing temperature. Annihilated superfluid carriers become normal and lose their momenta on lattice atoms. So if we induce a persistent supercurrent in a ring below Tc and after that slowly increase the temperature, we must observe a decrease in the actual supercurrent, because the density of electron pairs and total supercurrent momentum decrease. However, this supercurrent...

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
4K