Confusing linear momentum GRE question

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a linear momentum problem from the GRE physics exam, specifically focusing on the effects of a particle colliding with a stick at different points (end vs. center of mass) and the implications for the stick's center of mass velocity and angular momentum.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the point of collision and the resulting velocities of both the particle and the stick, questioning how momentum is transferred in elastic collisions. Some express confusion about the implications of hitting the stick at its center of mass versus its end.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, raising questions about the assumptions regarding elastic collisions and the resulting motion of the stick. There is a mix of interpretations regarding the effects of collision points on momentum transfer, with some guidance provided on the nature of linear versus angular momentum transfer.

Contextual Notes

There is an ongoing discussion about the conditions of the collision being elastic and the implications of mass ratios on the outcomes of the collisions. Some participants express uncertainty about the conservation of energy in this context.

PsychonautQQ
Messages
781
Reaction score
10

Homework Statement


http://grephysics.net/ans/8677/44


Homework Equations


p=mv


The Attempt at a Solution


Can somebody show me the math on why this is true? I feel like in my head if a particle hits the stick in the center of mass instead of at the end it would then make the center of mass of the stick move at greater velocity. This problem is showing that no matter where the particle hits the stick the center of mass of the stick has the same velocity and angular momentum doesn't matter? I'm confused ;-(
 
Physics news on Phys.org
In order for the particle to come to rest after making an elastic collision with the end of the rod, the ratio of the masses m/M must be a certain value (which you can work out as an exercise). If you let the same particle strike the center of the stick, then you cannot assume that the particle will now come to rest. You can work out the final speeds of the particle and the stick and see if your intuition is right about the center of the stick having a greater final speed when it gets hit at the center.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Thanks, TSny. I was working out some equations with conservation of energy in this case and I was wondering why I had a possible imaginary value for angular velocity. This now makes sense.
 
TSny said:
In order for the particle to come to rest after making an elastic collision with the end of the rod, the ratio of the masses m/M must be a certain value (which you can work out as an exercise). If you let the same particle strike the center of the stick, then you cannot assume that the particle will now come to rest. You can work out the final speeds of the particle and the stick and see if your intuition is right about the center of the stick having a greater final speed when it gets hit at the center.

Am i correct in my conclusion that if the particle hits the middle of the stick the sticks center of mass will have the same velocity as if it hit the same but the particle will retain some of it's velocity? If the particle hits the end of the stick it's transfers momentum into the stick in linear and angular form but if it hits the center of mass then it only transfers linear momentum? and the linear momentum transferred to the stick is independent of where the particle collides with it?
 
If the particle hits the stationary stick, after which the particle is stationary and the stick is moving, the velocity of the stick's center of mass will be ##\frac m M v## regardless of where the particle hits.

[strike]I do have an issue with that answer. It's the "One could use energy, but then one would have to take into account the inertia." There's nothing in the question that says the collision is elastic. You can't use conservation of (mechanical) energy if mechanical energy isn't conserved.[/strike]

Issue retracted. The question specifically says the collision is elastic.
 
Last edited:
PsychonautQQ said:
Am i correct in my conclusion that if the particle hits the middle of the stick the sticks center of mass will have the same velocity as if it hit the same but the particle will retain some of it's velocity?

I'm not sure what you mean by "as if it hit the same...".

If the ratio of the masses is such that the particle comes to rest when it strikes one of the ends of the stick, then it will not come to rest when it strikes any of the other points of the stick. For these other points, the particle will have a velocity after the collision and you should be able to determine if the final velocity of the particle is in the same direction of the initial velocity or opposite direction ("bounces back").

If the particle hits the end of the stick it's transfers momentum into the stick in linear and angular form but if it hits the center of mass then it only transfers linear momentum?

Yes.

and the linear momentum transferred to the stick is independent of where the particle collides with it?

No, the change in linear momentum of the stick will depend on where the stick is struck by the particle.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person

Similar threads

  • · Replies 62 ·
3
Replies
62
Views
14K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K