Confusion about Instructor's solution of HRK

AI Thread Summary
The instructor's solution for the initial speed of the ball, given by v_0=√(gR), assumes the final position of the projectile is y=0, which is incorrect since the actual final position is y=-4. This discrepancy may not significantly impact lower velocities but could lead to errors in extreme cases. The solution manual likely interprets the horizontal range R as the distance the ball travels before returning to its initial height of 4 ft, which complicates the accuracy of the formula used. Errors in solution manuals are not uncommon, highlighting the importance of careful interpretation in physics problems. Overall, the discussion emphasizes the need for clarity in understanding projectile motion and its implications.
phymath7
Messages
48
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
This is an excercise from the book 'Physics' by HRK:A batter hits a pitched ball at a height 4.0 ft above the ground so that its angle of projection is 45° and its horizontal range is 350 ft. The ball travels down the left field line where a 24-ft high fence is located 320 ft from home plate. Will the ball clear the fence? If so, by how much?
Relevant Equations
##y-y_0=xtan\theta-\frac {gx^2}{2v_0^2cos^2\theta}##
The instructor's solution goes like this:
The initial speed of the ball is given by ##v_0=\sqrt{gR}## where R is the range.But this is true if the final position of the projectile is y=0 but in this case, y=-4.Though this doesn't affect much in this case,but for higher velocity and extreme cases this certainly would.Am I right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, you are right.
 
TSny said:
Yes, you are right.
Then it's a pity that this solution manual contains such basic error.😑
 
phymath7 said:
Then it's a pity that this solution manual contains such basic error.😑

Perhaps the solution in the manual interprets the horizontal range R (350 ft) to be the horizontal distance that the ball would travel before it returns to its initial height of 4 ft above the ground (assuming the ball clears the fence). Then, ##v_0 = \sqrt{gR}## is OK. I'm not defending this interpretation, but it might be what was going on in the mind of whoever wrote the solution. Who knows. I'm with you in interpreting the horizontal range as the horizontal distance traveled until landing on the ground.

It's fairly common for solution manuals to have occasional errors.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes SolarisOne and topsquark
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Trying to understand the logic behind adding vectors with an angle between them'
My initial calculation was to subtract V1 from V2 to show that from the perspective of the second aircraft the first one is -300km/h. So i checked with ChatGPT and it said I cant just subtract them because I have an angle between them. So I dont understand the reasoning of it. Like why should a velocity be dependent on an angle? I was thinking about how it would look like if the planes where parallel to each other, and then how it look like if one is turning away and I dont see it. Since...
Back
Top