Confusion with induction problem.

In summary, the conversation discusses defining the exponentiation of a number a to a power of 0 and negative integers, and proving three laws of exponentiation using induction for positive and negative integers. The individual is asking for clarification on how to approach the problem and is given advice on using the previously proven law for positive integers to prove the same for negative integers.
  • #1
Unassuming
167
0

Homework Statement


Let a in R and a != 0. Define a^0=1 and for all n in the positive integers, a^-n = 1/a^n.

Show,

a^n a^m =a^(n+m)

(a^n)^m = a^nm

a^m b^m =(ab)^m

for all a,b != 0 and n,m in Z.


The Attempt at a Solution



Notice that last part where it says Z, not just N. I just proved these 3 laws using induction for n,m in N. I am confused now on how to approach the problem.

Do I fix n, and let m = -1 for the base case. Then assume the statement is true to m<0 and show it is also true for m-1 ?

Thank you for your time.

EDIT: P35 in Munkres, Topology
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
If you have proved that anam[/sup]= an+m for positive integers then you should be able to prove, in the same way, that a-na-m= a-n-m for m and n any positive integers.
 

1. What is the induction problem in science?

The induction problem is the philosophical question of how we can justify the use of inductive reasoning to make conclusions about the world. Inductive reasoning involves making generalizations based on observations or past experiences, but it does not provide a guarantee that those generalizations will hold true in the future.

2. How does the induction problem impact scientific research?

The induction problem can impact scientific research by raising questions about the validity and reliability of our conclusions. It highlights the fact that scientific knowledge is always tentative and subject to change as new evidence is discovered.

3. Can the induction problem be solved?

The induction problem is an ongoing philosophical debate and there is no consensus on a definitive solution. Some argue that it can be solved through the use of strong empirical evidence and statistical methods, while others argue that it is an inherent limitation of human knowledge.

4. What is the difference between induction and deduction?

Induction is a form of reasoning that involves making generalizations based on specific observations or experiences. Deduction, on the other hand, involves starting with a general principle or theory and applying it to specific cases to draw conclusions.

5. How can scientists address the challenges posed by the induction problem?

Scientists can address the challenges posed by the induction problem by using rigorous scientific methods, replicating experiments, and constantly testing and refining their theories. Additionally, being aware of the limitations of induction and being open to revising or discarding theories when new evidence arises can help mitigate the impact of the induction problem.

Similar threads

  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
410
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
942
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
8
Views
945
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
514
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
504
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
576
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
521
Back
Top