Confusion with Potential Energy and Work

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the relationship between work, potential energy, and the forces acting on a brick lifted from 0m to 1m. When lifting the brick, the work done by the hand is positive, while the work done by gravity is negative, leading to an increase in potential energy. The confusion arises from the equations relating work and energy, particularly how ΔU (change in potential energy) is positive while W (work) can be negative when considering gravitational force. The net work done on the brick can be zero if it is at rest at the initial and final positions, illustrating the balance of forces. Overall, understanding the distinction between conservative and non-conservative forces clarifies the energy dynamics involved.
bdolle
Messages
10
Reaction score
1
In my physics textbook chapter of work 3 statements are made which I am having trouble sorting through.

1. When W>0 the system's energy increases, when W<0 the system's energy decreases.
2. ΔE = ΔK+ΔU+ΔTherm = W
3. ΔU = -W

Here is where my confusion begins. If I move a 1kg brick from 0m to 1m I have added potential energy, more energy is stored in the system. Statement 2 asserts that because ΔU increases, ΔE will also increase and work will be positive. Statement 1 says that W>0 so the system's energy increases. But statement 3 says that ΔU= -W, but we can see clearly that ΔU was positive and that work is also positive.

I am missing something. Please help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There are two forces acting on the brick.
1. The gravitational force
2. The force exerted by your hand
When you lift the brick from 0m to 1m, the work done by you is +ve and the work by gravity is -ve.
Potential energy is a quantity to be associated only with conservative forces. The gravitational force is conservative; the force exerted by you is not.
So in the third equation, W (by gravity) is -ve and the ##\Delta U## is positive.
 
Aniruddha@94 said:
There are two forces acting on the brick.
1. The gravitational force
2. The force exerted by your hand
When you lift the brick from 0m to 1m, the work done by you is +ve and the work by gravity is -ve.
Potential energy is a quantity to be associated only with conservative forces. The gravitational force is conservative; the force exerted by you is not.
So in the third equation, W (by gravity) is -ve and the ##\Delta U## is positive.

What about net work done on the system? +ve or -ve? Why?

Thank you
 
When you first accelerate the mass upward the force up from your hand is slightly higher than the gravity force down. This means there is a smal amount of + net work done on the mass and this becomes the masses kinetic energy. As you slow your hand down towards the top the force up is less than gravity force down so +work done by you is less than -work done by gravity so net work during deceleration is negative and is equal to the loss in ke so you could think of the + work done during the acceleration bit representing the increase in ke (chemical to kinetic) and the -net work done bit at the end representing loss in ke (ke to gravitational potential)
 
  • Like
Likes beamie564
@bdolle you can see from the work-energy theorem that the net work done on the brick is zero ( provided the brick is at rest in the initial and final positions).
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top