Congruence of the sum of terms in a reduced residue system

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a property of the sum of terms in a reduced residue system modulo m, specifically that the sum equals zero modulo m. The context includes considerations of different cases based on the parity of m and its divisors.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of the properties of gcd in relation to the elements of the reduced residue system. There are attempts to prove the statement for both odd and even values of m, with specific challenges noted for m with higher powers of 2 as a divisor.

Discussion Status

Some participants have offered insights into the relationships between elements of the reduced residue system and their sums, while others express uncertainty about the even case. The discussion is ongoing, with various interpretations and approaches being explored.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the evenness of phi(m) for m>2, and the implications of this on the structure of the reduced residue system. Additionally, the complexity introduced by different divisors of m is acknowledged.

reyomit
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Prove that if {r1,r2,...rx} is a reduced residue system mod m (where x=[tex]\phi[/tex](m), m>2), then
r1 + r2 + ... + rx= 0 mod m.

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution


I've been able to prove it pretty simply for odd m and for m=2k where k is odd, but for m with higher powers of 2 as a divisor I'm stuck.
Any ideas?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
If gcd(a,m)=1, what can you say about gcd(m-a,m)?
 
I see that (a,m)=1 immediately implies that (m-a,m)=1,and used that to prove that
2(r1 + r2 + ... +rx) = 0 mod m.

Then when m is odd 2 has a multiplicative inverse mod m, and we can just multiply by that to get r1 + r2 + ... +rx = 0 mod m.

But when m is even, I'm not totally sure, what to do.
 
Let me be more explicit, using that (m-a,a)=1 whenever (m,a)=1, I concluded
(m-r1)+(m-r2)+...+(m-rx)=r1+...+rx mod m
and also
(m-r1)+(m-r2)+...+(m-rx)= -r1-r2-...-rx mod m.

So -(r1+...+rx)=r1+...+rx mod m
or 2(r1+...+rx)=0 mod m.
 
You're making it a little more complex than it is. First, notice that phi(m) is even for m>2. Then if gcd(a,m)=1, then gcd(m-a,m)=1 (as you found), so that both a and m-a are in the reduced residue system.

So, you can split the elements of the reduced residue system into pairs, each of which sums to m.
 
I feel much the fool.
Thank you.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K