Conquering the Conundrum: Simplifying the Sum of n!/(1000^n)

  • Thread starter Thread starter FrostScYthe
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the convergence or divergence of the series represented by the sum of n!/(1000^n). Participants are exploring the implications of factorial growth compared to exponential growth within the context of series convergence.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the convergence of the series and discussing the application of the ratio test. There are varying opinions on whether n! grows faster than 1000^n and how this affects the series' behavior. Some participants are attempting to prove their assumptions algebraically, while others are clarifying the conditions for convergence.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with multiple interpretations being explored. Some participants suggest that the series diverges based on their reasoning, while others provide counterarguments and emphasize the need for careful analysis of the terms involved. Guidance on using the ratio test has been offered, but there is no explicit consensus on the conclusion.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through the complexities of convergence criteria and the implications of factorial versus exponential growth. There is an emphasis on the necessity of terms approaching zero for convergence, but also a recognition that this condition alone is not sufficient.

FrostScYthe
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
inf
Sum n!/(1000^n)
i = 1

Is that with geometric series... or what?!... all I can think of is splitting n! and the fraction (1/1000)^n, anyway, any help appreciated :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The first question you need to ask is whether this sum converges or diverges.

Have you studied Big-O notation? Is 1000^n O(n!)? Or visa versa? Don't be fooled by what happens at small values of n. Eventually one of the expressions will overwhelm the other. Which is it? and what happens when it does?
 
Do the ratio test.
 
n! would overwhelm 1000^n eventually, I think, if I'm correct... I am guessing it diverges.. but I need to prove this algebraically...
ratio test hmmm I'm not sure how to do this for that?

n!/n! 1
------------ = -------------- agh I don't get anywhere X\
(1000^n)/n! (1000^n)/n!
 
courtrigrad said:
[tex]n![/tex] would be less than [tex]1000^{n}[/tex] for all n. Since [tex]a_{n} \rightarrow 0[/tex] as [tex]n\rightarrow \infty[/tex], the series converges.

Try the ratio test on this series, I think you're mistaken.
 
courtrigrad said:
[tex]\lim_{n\rightarrow \infty} |\frac{(n+1)n!}{1000^{n+1}}\frac{1000^{n}}{n!}| = \frac{n+1}{1000}[/tex]

As [tex]n\rightarrow \infty[/tex], [tex]|\frac{a_{n+1}}{a_{n}}| \rightarrow 0[/tex]. So it converges.

How does (n+1)/1000 approach 0 as n goes to infinity?
 
I'm trying to reply by quoting your post #5 courtri but the quote juste won't appear.

Anyway, I just want to point out in relation to that post, that given a series [itex]\sum a_n[/itex], it is a nessesary condition for convergence that [itex]a_n\rightarrow 0[/itex] but it is not sufficient! In other words, that some series has a vanishing general term does not means it converges.

However, if a series has a diverging general term, then it diverges. It is a useful criterion for proving a series diverges, but cannot be used as a proof for convergence.
 
And also in relation to your post #5 (why did you delete it, it was an intructive error that the OP could have beneficiated from). It can be seen in a nice way from the way you wrote the sequence that it diverges:

[tex]\frac{n!}{1000^n}=\frac{1}{1000}\frac{2}{1000}...\frac{n}{1000}[/tex]

As soon as [itex]n\geq 1000*1000=1000000[/itex] for instance, you can rearange the terms two by two like so (ok it looks ridiculous i admit):

[tex]\frac{1000000!}{1000^{1000000}}=\left(\frac{1}{1000}\frac{1000000}{1000}\right)\left(\frac{2}{1000}\frac{999999}{1000}\right)...\left(\frac{500000}{1000}\frac{500001}{1000}\right)[/tex]

Everyone's greater than one so it is easy to see that past n=1000000, the general term is always greater than unity, so the limit will not converge to 0, so the series must diverge.
 
quasar987 said:
Anyway, I just want to point out in relation to that post, that given a series [itex]\sum a_n[/itex], it is a nessesary condition for convergence that [itex]a_n\rightarrow 0[/itex] but it is not sufficient! In other words, that some series has a vanishing general term does not means it converges.

You don't mean vanish. Terms vanish if they are zero, thus you have described a finite sum. Tending to zero is not the same as vanish (being equal to zero).
 
  • #10
Cool, I didn't know.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K