Conquering the Physics GRE Section 1.1 Prob. 3

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on solving a physics problem involving two blocks with masses M and m, where block M moves on a surface with a coefficient of kinetic friction μ_1, and block m is subject to static friction μ_2. The goal is to determine the minimum force F required to keep block m stationary relative to block M. The initial solution provided by the user was incorrect, leading to a collaborative effort to analyze the forces acting on both blocks, ultimately identifying the need to account for all forces, including frictional forces acting on block M.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion (∑F=ma)
  • Knowledge of friction coefficients (kinetic μ_1 and static μ_2)
  • Ability to draw and analyze free-body diagrams
  • Familiarity with basic mechanics concepts involving forces and motion
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the concept of static vs. kinetic friction in physics problems
  • Learn how to construct and analyze free-body diagrams for multiple objects
  • Study the application of Newton's second law in multi-body systems
  • Explore advanced problems involving friction and forces in physics
USEFUL FOR

Students preparing for the Physics GRE, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in mastering force analysis in multi-body systems.

coca-cola
Messages
17
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Two blocks of masses M and m are oriented as shown in the diagram. The block M moves on a surface with coefficient of kinetic friction μ_1, and the coefficient of static friction between two blocks is μ_2. What is the minimum force F which must be applied to M such that m remains stationary relative to M?

The diagram essentially looks like Utah rotated 90 degrees clockwise.


Homework Equations


∑F=ma
F_f = F_N * μ

The Attempt at a Solution



I drew force diagrams for both objects and summed up the forces, as is standard with these problems. My answer was:

g * (μ_1 * M + (m / μ_2))

The book tells you the correct answer and this is not it. I have triple checked my diagrams but I can't find my error.

Any help is greatly appreciated!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
coca-cola said:
The diagram essentially looks like Utah rotated 90 degrees clockwise.
:biggrin:

coca-cola said:
What is the minimum force F ...

Did you mean to say "What is the maximum force ...?" (Or am I misunderstanding the problem?)
Edit:
TSny said:
Does the attached diagram correctly show the configuration?

Ahh, that diagram makes more sense as to why they asked for the minimum (I was imagining utah rotated 90 degrees in the other direction)
 
Last edited:
Hello, coca-cola.

To help you find your error, we'll need to see the details of your work. You might start by describing the force diagrams.

How many forces do you have acting on M? Can you describe the nature of each force and the direction of each force?

Same questions for the forces acting on m.

Does the attached diagram correctly show the configuration?
 

Attachments

  • two blocks.png
    two blocks.png
    497 bytes · Views: 898
The attached diagram is a correct representation and it states "...minimum force F..." in the problem. I have three forces on the smaller block:

Force to the right exerted by the bigger block
Gravity downwards
The frictional force that keeps the block up upwards

On the larger block, 5 forces:

Gravity downwards
Normal force upwards
Applied force to the right
Force from the smaller block to the left
Frictional force to the left
 
coca-cola said:
The attached diagram is a correct representation and it states "...minimum force F..." in the problem. I have three forces on the smaller block:

Force to the right exerted by the bigger block
Gravity downwards
The frictional force that keeps the block up upwards

Good

On the larger block, 5 forces:

Gravity downwards
Normal force upwards
Applied force to the right
Force from the smaller block to the left
Frictional force to the left

I think there is one more force on the larger block. Can you identify it?
 
The only one that I can think of is a frictional force exerted downward on the larger block. Is this correct?
 
Yes. Good.
 
Haha yes! Thank you very much!
 
You're welcome. That's a nice exercise.
 

Similar threads

Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 34 ·
2
Replies
34
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K