Conservation energy to find escape velocity

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the concept of escape velocity, particularly how conservation of energy can be applied to determine it. Participants explore the effects of Earth's rotation, the angle of launch, and the relationship between linear velocity and the velocity supplied to an object being launched. The conversation includes both theoretical considerations and practical implications of launching objects from different locations on Earth.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory
  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants propose that when calculating escape velocity, one should consider both the linear velocity due to Earth's rotation and the velocity supplied to the object being launched.
  • Others argue that the escape velocity is independent of the angle of launch and is a scalar quantity determined solely by the mass of the gravitating body and the distance from it.
  • A participant mentions that launching from the equator provides an advantage due to the additional linear velocity from Earth's rotation, while launching from the poles does not offer this benefit.
  • There is a contention regarding the addition of kinetic energies, with some participants suggesting that the correct approach involves vector addition, while others emphasize that escape velocity is a speed, not a vector quantity.
  • Some participants express confusion about the relationship between escape velocity and the angle of launch, with differing opinions on whether the angle affects the required velocity to escape Earth's gravitational field.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally disagree on the relationship between escape velocity and the angle of launch, with some asserting it does not depend on the angle while others maintain that it does. The discussion remains unresolved regarding the correct interpretation of how to incorporate linear velocity and the angle into the calculation of escape velocity.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the discussion regarding assumptions about reference frames and the definitions of terms like escape velocity versus escape speed. Some participants also mention potential errors in calculations without reaching a consensus on the correct approach.

kaminasimon
Messages
7
Reaction score
0
Guy, i have a problem. When we use conservation energy to find the escape velocity, ie the root of potentiality is unlimited, why we don't compute the velocity of earth? We knew the Earth rotated its axis, then everything in surface was had linear velocity. So when we launch a thing, it's general velocity is sum of 2 vector velocity, one is linear velocity, other is velocity we supplied. That is
(0.5 ×mv^2) +(0.5×mV^2)-(GMm÷(r^2))>=0
Which v,V are linear velocity and velocity of thing we launched respectively
We obtain,...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
We knew on the surface v= (2π÷T)×R which R is radius of Earth and T is period and we have
V^2>=(GM÷R)-[(4π^2)÷T^2]×R^2 and result is Min V= 7.893961 km/s
 
What you're saying is true. That's why it is easier to launch a rocket from the equator than from the poles (at the poles you wouldn't get the extra boost due to Earth's rotation). There is a mistake in you calculation though. You can't just add the two kinetic energies. If V = v + v' than V^2 = v^2 + v'^2 + 2 v.v'. You forgot to include the last term in your calculation. I think you also missed a factor of 2 somewhere in there...
 
Note that the rotation of the Earth does not alter the escape velocity at all. That is why we don't use it in the computation. What the rotation of the Earth does is make it easier to achieve escape velocity, i.e. the delta V to reach escape velocity is smaller if we launch with the rotation near the equator.
 
I know. The escape velocity depends on the angle we launched. I forgot tell you i assumming the angle is 90 (perpendicular to surface)
 
Thanks for answer
 
kaminasimon said:
I know. The escape velocity depends on the angle we launched. I forgot tell you i assumming the angle is 90 (perpendicular to surface)
But it doesn't. The escape velocity, despite its name, is actually escape speed, as it is completely irrelevant which direction the body is moving - as long as we make sure it doesn't crash/slow down in the atmosphere. If it were a micro black hole, or a neutrino, for example, you could shoot it directly below your feet, and as long as the speed was sufficient, it would pass through and escape.

EV value is dependent only on the mass producing the gravitational field and the distance from that mass.

What DaleSpam is saying, is merely that once you've calculated the value of the EV, you can then use a variety of ways to achieve it most economically - like choosing the best launch angle and lattitude. But it's got nothing to do with escape velocity as such.
 
kaminasimon said:
I know. The escape velocity depends on the angle we launched.
No, it doesn't. Escape velocity is a bit of a misnomer; a better name would be escape speed. Escape velocity is not a vector. It is a scalar function of distance from the center of the gravitating body (the Earth in this case), the mass of the gravitating body, and nothing else.

An object launched with a velocity whose magnitude is exactly equal to the escape velocity will just barely escape the gravitational clutches of the gravitating body. Anything less than escape velocity means the object will remain gravitationally bound to the gravitating body. Anything more than escape velocity means velocity remain non-zero as the distance tends to infinity.
 
Thank you very much
 
  • #10
I think it depends on the angle and absolutely the mass escapes the gravitational field of earth. If the angle is enough small to escape the field the the velocity we supplied will be smaller. Because Vector(V)= vector(v1)+vector(v2). The module V^2=(v1)^2+(v2)^2+2(v1)(v2)cos(c) where c is angle form vector(v1) and vector(v2). V1 is velocity we supplied and v2 is linear velocity. So v1 will be smaller than. It is depends reference frame we chosen. In my reference frame i chosen is station reference in the universe.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
kaminasimon said:
I think it depends on the angle
This is not correct. The escape velocity does not depend on the angle, only the speed.
 
  • #12
kaminasimon said:
I think it depends on the angle and absolutely the mass escapes the gravitational field of earth. If the angle is enough small to escape the field the the velocity we supplied will be smaller. Because Vector(V)= vector(v1)+vector(v2). The module V^2=(v1)^2+(v2)^2+2(v1)(v2)cos© which© is angle form vector(v1) and vector(v2). V1 is velocity we supplied and v2 is linear velocity. So v1 will be smaller than. It is depends reference frame we chosen. In my reference frame i chosen is station reference in the universe

You're getting confused because you think the scape velocity is measure with respect to the moving ground in which case it depends on the direction as you said. But the escape velocity is actually defined relative to the center of mass reference frame and is therefore independent of the direction.
 
  • #13
kaminasimon said:
I think it depends on the angle and absolutely the mass escapes the gravitational field of earth. If the angle is enough small to escape the field the the velocity we supplied will be smaller. Because Vector(V)= vector(v1)+vector(v2). The module V^2=(v1)^2+(v2)^2+2(v1)(v2)cos© which© is angle form vector(v1) and vector(v2). V1 is velocity we supplied and v2 is linear velocity. So v1 will be smaller than. It is depends reference frame we chosen. In my reference frame i chosen is station reference in the universe
Note that your post contains ©, where you obviously meant (c). I find it to be rather hard to convince the autocorrect that, yes, I really did mean "c between two parentheses" rather than the copyright symbol. I fixed your post.Regarding the technical details of your post, escape velocity is just a speed. It is independent of direction, independent of current velocity. That said, if an object is already moving at some velocity, achieving escape velocity is most easily accomplished by making the change in velocity, the Δv, be parallel to that initial velocity, and is hardest if the change in velocity is directed against the initial velocity.
 
  • #14
Sorry i mean the velocity we supplied is smaller if we launched it on equator and it depends on the angle we launched. Sorry i forget it is the velocity we supplied and THE ESCAPE SPEED DOES NOT DEPENDS ON REFERENCE FRAME AND THE ANGLE WE LAUNCHED.thanks i am understand now. The escape speed is the value of velocity that everything could escape gravitational field
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
10K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K