A Conservation Laws from Continuity Equations in Fluid Flow

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the application of the continuity equation in fluid dynamics, particularly through the lens of differential forms as presented in Frankel's "The Geometry of Physics." It explores how the Reynolds Transport Theorem (RTT) can be generalized, leading to the conservation of integrals of forms under flow. The key question raised is about the interpretation of the integral of a p-form, particularly when it satisfies the continuity equation, and what conserved quantity it represents. Examples are provided, including scalar functions and vorticity forms, to illustrate the concept of conservation in different contexts. The conversation concludes with inquiries about expressing momentum and energy as differential forms and their relationship to conservation laws in fluid mechanics.
Stuart_M
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
TL;DR Summary
There is a version of Reynolds Transport Theorem for differential forms: what is the conserved quantity?
Consider a fluid flow with density ##\rho=\rho(t,x)## and velocity vector ##v=v(t,x)##. Assume it satisfies the continuity equation
$$
\partial_t \rho + \nabla \cdot (\rho v) = 0.
$$
We now that, by Reynolds Transport Theorem (RTT), this implies that the total mass is conserved
$$
\frac{d}{dt}\int_{\Omega_t} \rho dx = 0,
$$
where ##\Omega_t## is some control volume (which I understand in the following way: I fix a region ##\Omega## at time ##0##; I let ##\Omega## evolve with the flow at time ##t## and I obtain ##\Omega_t=\Phi_t(\Omega)##). I have recently been reading Frankel's "The Geometry of Physics" and I've learnt that using differential forms it is possible to generalise (RTT) in the following way (see Chapter 4, Section 3):
$$
\frac{d}{dt} \int_{S(t)} \alpha = \int_{S(t)} (\partial_t \alpha + L_v \alpha)
$$
where now ##\alpha## are (time-indexed family of) ##p##-forms, ##S## is a fixed ##p##-manifold and ##S(t) = \Phi_t(S)## is the evolution of ##S## under the flow of ##v##, and ##L_v## denotes the Lie derivative. From this we easily deduce that, if a ##p##-form satisfies the "continuity equation"
$$
\partial_t \alpha + L_v \alpha = 0
$$
then the quantity ##\int_{S(t)} \alpha## is constant in time. If ##\alpha## is a (top-dimensional) volume form, then we recover (RTT) and thus the conservation of *mass*. However, in the general case what does the quantity ##\int_{S(t)} \alpha## represent?

I have considered some easy toy examples: if ##\alpha = f## is a ##0##-form (i.e. scalar function), then the "continuity equation" reads ##\partial_t f + v \cdot \nabla f = 0##, whence ##f(t,\Phi_t(x)) = f(0,x)## and indeed this can be expressed as "conservation of the integral of ##f## on 0-dimensional manifolds". However, which quantity is conserved?

Another example [taken from Frankel, ibidem]: in Euler, the vorticity *form* ##\omega=d \nu## (##\nu## being the velocity *co*vector) is invariant under the flow, i.e. solves the continuity equation in the sense of 2-forms. Therefore,
$$
\int_{S(t)} \omega
$$
is constant for any 2-manifold ##S##. Which conservation law am I rediscovering? Which conserved quantity is this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
In fluid mechanics, we have transport equations for the following:

Global quantityLocal quantity
MassDensity
MomentumMomentum per unit volume
EnergyEnergy per unit volume
Amount of substanceConcentration
(No standard name)Vorticity
Concentration is either amount per unit mass or amount per unit volume.

Note that \int \alpha is not necessarily conserved itself; it is also necessary to account for sources and sinks of the quantity.
 
pasmith said:
In fluid mechanics, we have transport equations for the following:

Global quantityLocal quantity
MassDensity
MomentumMomentum per unit volume
EnergyEnergy per unit volume
Amount of substanceConcentration
(No standard name)Vorticity
Concentration is either amount per unit mass or amount per unit volume.

Note that \int \alpha is not necessarily conserved itself; it is also necessary to account for sources and sinks of the quantity.
Thank you for your reply and for the table.
I am not sure I am able to see the link with my question with differential forms, though. Is there a way to phrase the momentum per unit volume (or the energy per unit volume) as a differential form? If so, can we say that this form satisfies the "continuity equation" (in the right formulation) and deduce the conservation of the corresponding global quantity? But this would seem strange to me: by the generalized RTT we would we get the conservation of this quantity only when "integrated" over some p-dimensional manifold (I'm in an ideal world, no sinks/sources for the time being). What does this mean? Is this some sort of generalized flux? I'm sorry for my confusion, I hope somebody can shed some light here. Thanks!
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top