Conservation of angular momentum book problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conservation of angular momentum in a physics problem involving a disk and a rod. The initial angular momentum is calculated by summing the angular momentum contributions from both the rod and the disk, with the reference point at B. The velocity of the rod's center of gravity is not included in the solution because the moment of inertia (MOI) used for the rod is 1/3ML², which already accounts for its angular momentum. If a different MOI, such as 1/12ML², were used, the angular momentum from the rod's center of mass would need to be added, illustrating the application of the Parallel-Axis Theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of angular momentum concepts
  • Familiarity with moment of inertia calculations
  • Knowledge of the Parallel-Axis Theorem
  • Basic principles of rotational dynamics
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Parallel-Axis Theorem in detail
  • Learn about different moment of inertia formulas for various shapes
  • Explore examples of angular momentum conservation in complex systems
  • Review rotational dynamics problems involving multiple objects
USEFUL FOR

Students studying physics, particularly those focusing on mechanics and angular momentum, as well as educators looking for examples of applying the Parallel-Axis Theorem in problem-solving.

joahe
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


upload_2015-12-7_22-38-57.png
2. The attempt at a solution

I set the initial angular momentum of the disk = to the sum of : rod's angular momentum, angular momentum of disk, rod's center of gravity and disk's center of gravity. With the reference point being at B.

Why is the velocity of the rod's center of gravity not included in the solution?

Thanks for any and all help.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
joahe said:
Why is the velocity of the rod's center of gravity not included in the solution?

It has already been taken into account because the moment of inertia used for the rod was 1/3ML2. If the MOI used was 1/12ML2 then you can add the angular momentum contribution from the velocity of the rod's center of mass. This is essentially the application of the Parallel-Axis Theorem.

Hope this helps!
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: joahe
JeremyG said:
It has already been taken into account because the moment of inertia used for the rod was 1/3ML2. If the MOI used was 1/12ML2 then you can add the angular momentum contribution from the velocity of the rod's center of mass. This is essentially the application of the Parallel-Axis Theorem.

Hope this helps!

Thanks Jeremy, that completely clears things up. Cheers!
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
916
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
10
Views
3K