Conservation of Angular Momentum of solid sphere

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a small solid sphere rolling inside a large fixed hemisphere, focusing on the conservation of angular momentum and kinetic energy. The original poster has calculated the kinetic energy at the bottom of the hemisphere but is uncertain about the relevant equations and concepts involved in the problem.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants inquire about the specific goal of the problem and the types of energy present at different points in the sphere's motion. There is a focus on understanding the relationship between potential energy and kinetic energy, particularly regarding rotational motion.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights into the types of energy involved and have prompted the original poster to clarify their understanding of energy at the top and bottom of the motion. The discussion is ongoing with multiple interpretations being explored.

Contextual Notes

The original poster's calculations involve potential energy relative to a specific reference point, which has led to discussions about the implications of this choice on the energy values at different positions of the sphere.

G-reg
Messages
41
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A small solid sphere, with radius 0.25 cm and mass 0.61 g rolls without slipping on the inside of a large fixed hemisphere with radius 17 cm and a vertical axis of symmetry. The sphere starts at the top from rest.

And I figured out that the KE at the bottom is = .001J



Homework Equations


I really don't know what equations would be relevant besides a proportion..



The Attempt at a Solution


I'm thinking it's something like

(#/.001) = (x/100)
and I cross multiply to find x
but I really have no clue and would really appreciate some help on this one!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What exactly do you want to find?
 
The fraction of its kinetic energy at the bottom is associated with rotation about an axis through its center of mass
 
G-reg said:
The fraction of its kinetic energy at the bottom is associated with rotation about an axis through its center of mass


How did you get the kinetic energy at the bottom?
 
by multiplying mgh = (6.1e-4)(9.8)(.17) = .001J
 
G-reg said:
by multiplying mgh = (6.1e-4)(9.8)(.17) = .001J

Then you are measuring potential energy relative to a plane passing through the radius of the hemisphere (taken as 0 potential energy).

In that case, the potential energy at the bottom is mgh = (6.1e-4)(9.8)(-0.17) = -0.001 J


Ok, so at the top, what energy does it have?

At the bottom what types of energy does the sphere possess?
 
Ok, so at the top it would be 0?
At the bottom it would be all PE again
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
335
Views
17K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K