Conservation of Energy Along an Incline with Friction

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conservation of energy along an incline with friction, emphasizing the roles of nonconservative forces such as work done by a person and friction. The key equation derived is Work by person = (1/2)mgdsin(theta) + (3/2) mu*mgdcos(theta), illustrating how friction affects the total mechanical energy. Participants explore how the work done by the person remains constant despite changes in gravitational potential energy and the implications of kinetic energy when the block is in motion. The conversation highlights the interplay between work, energy, and friction in mechanical systems.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy and its calculation
  • Knowledge of kinetic energy and the work-energy theorem
  • Familiarity with the concept of friction as a nonconservative force
  • Basic principles of mechanics involving inclined planes
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the work-energy theorem in depth, focusing on its applications in various mechanical systems
  • Explore the effects of friction on energy conservation in different scenarios
  • Learn about terminal velocity and its relationship with kinetic energy and friction
  • Investigate the mathematical modeling of energy transformations in inclined planes
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the dynamics of energy conservation in systems involving friction and inclined planes.

ag3
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
A person pulls a mass m (initially at rest) all the way to the top of an incline and then allows it to slide halfway down the incline before exerting enough tension force to stop the mass at this halfway point. If the coefficient of kinetic friction is mu, the length of the incline is d, the angle of inclination is theta, what is the total work done by the person?
Relevant Equations
Change in Mechanical Energy = Work Nonconservative

Kinetic Friction Force = mu mgcos(theta)
Gravitational Potential Energy = mgh
There are two nonconservative forces in this situation, the work done by the person and the work done by friction - they are the only sources of work that change the total mechanical energy of the mass-Earth system.

The initial energy (assuming gravitational potential energy is initially 0) is 0 and the final energy would only consist of gravitational potential energy, which is
(1/2)mgdsin(theta)

Thus,
(1/2)mgdsin(theta) = Work by person - (3/2) mu*mgdcos(theta)
so

Work by person = (1/2)mgdsin(theta) + (3/2) mu*mgdcos(theta)

I get how to solve the problem, but want more understanding on the general physics of the situation presented in the problem, so I have 2 questions:

1. If the person who did the work allowed the block to fall further down the incline, friction would have done more work on the block, but the change in gravitational potential energy, and thus total mechanical energy, would decrease. Do these differences compensate so that the work done by the person stays constant no matter what height the block falls to? If not, does the person's work increase or decrease as he/she allows the block to fall more of a distance until he stops it?

2. How does kinetic energy play into this situation? Let's say the person did not stop the block as it was going back down the ramp and that the problem asked to find the work done by the person as the block was halfway down and still moving (assuming the work done by friction does not make it stop moving entirely). Would this answer differ from the answer from the original problem and how so?

Thanks again. I know these questions are a little bit off from what the problem was asking, but I like asking these questions to gain a better intuition of the situations presented in physics problems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Can't you apply the method of the original problem solution to the case of only lowering the mass by a given distance?
 
Both friction and the person slowing the block at the end seem to be doing negative work. Energy is not expended by these thing, but rather they are receiving energy.

Suppose a spring shoots a block into the air vertically. It does work on the block in doing so. Now the block comes back down onto the spring again which stops the block and recompresses the spring. The system now is in its original state with no energy lost anywhere. The work done by the spring is recaptured as negative work done on the block when it returns.
 
Welcome, ag3 :cool:

ag3 said:
...
1. If the person who did the work allowed the block to fall further down the incline, friction would have done more work on the block, but the change in gravitational potential energy, and thus total mechanical energy, would decrease. Do these differences compensate so that the work done by the person stays constant no matter what height the block falls to? If not, does the person's work increase or decrease as he/she allows the block to fall more of a distance until he stops it?
...

The amount of work or energy originally put into the block by the person while increasing its height (potential energy) remains the same.

The person actually does more work than the net work required to lift the block against gravity (##W_{net}=F_{net}h##) because friction opposes the motion.
Friction does negative work and removes some of the energy the person expends while pulling the block all the way up the incline.

After releasing the block to gravity, that useful work can be partially or totally removed from the block by friction in its natural way down.
Friction always opposes movement and always converts mechanical work into thermal energy or heat (hence, it is called negative work respect to the block) that is eventually transferred to the surroundings (incline and air).
ag3 said:
2. How does kinetic energy play into this situation? Let's say the person did not stop the block as it was going back down the ramp and that the problem asked to find the work done by the person as the block was halfway down and still moving (assuming the work done by friction does not make it stop moving entirely). Would this answer differ from the answer from the original problem and how so?
...

Assuming the incline is long enough and friction high, in terms of energy, friction will do negative work until it has removed all of the blocks’s kinetic energy and motion stops.
Otherwise, it would reach a balance point with gravity and a terminal velocity would be reached until the block naturally returns back to its original position.

Please, see:
https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/frequently-made-errors-mechanics-friction/

https://courses.lumenlearning.com/physics/chapter/7-2-kinetic-energy-and-the-work-energy-theorem/

:cool:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
55
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K