Conservation of energy and gravity

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the concepts of gravitational potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE) in the context of a falling ball, emphasizing the importance of defining system boundaries. When considering the ball and Earth as a system, the work done is internal, leading to the conclusion that the change in KE equals the change in PE. However, when isolating the ball, external gravitational forces do work on it, suggesting that PE is still relevant as long as gravity acts on the ball. The conversation highlights that potential energy is arbitrary and depends on the chosen reference point within a gravitational field.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of gravitational potential energy (PE) and kinetic energy (KE)
  • Familiarity with Newton's Third Law of motion
  • Knowledge of system boundaries in physics
  • Basic concepts of conservative forces
NEXT STEPS
  • Explore the concept of system boundaries in physics and their implications on energy calculations
  • Study the principles of conservative forces and their role in energy conservation
  • Investigate the relationship between gravitational fields and potential energy
  • Learn about the implications of Newton's Third Law on internal and external forces
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators explaining energy concepts, and anyone interested in the principles of mechanics and energy conservation.

kykk
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
I am a bit confuse about gravity and work
Suppose a ball falls from one height to another, hi to hf

When talking about the system BE the ball AND the earth, all the work done is internal, and no external work, change in KE = change in PE, right?

But when talking about the system B of just the ball only,
total energy of the system B increase? because external force gravity is doing work on the ball?

Change in KE increase, I know that, .5mv^2, velocity increase
But what about PE? if gravity is external force, then the ball doesn't have potential energy to start with at hi ? So potential energy are only for a system that includes earth?

Am I looking at these... gravitational potential energy and work stuff all wrong?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Falling in gravity, the gravitational field does work (loss in PE) on the ball (which gains KE).

The ball still has PE in the case where it is treated by itself because there is a gravitational force acting on it.
Doesn't matter if the forces are internal or external. The PE comes from the field.
 
What's the difference between internal and external forces??
I don't know if this will help but I remember gravity is a negative potential as at infinity away from mass potential is zero. I don't know what you mean by system B and A are as I imagine they are the same system because the Ball has equal pull on the Earth as the Earth does on the ball; as Simon Said "The PE comes from the field."
 
It may also be helpful to remember that potential energy is entirely arbitrary. It doesn't matter what's in your snapshot of a system, all that matters is that you have a conservative force (e.g. gravity) and two points of reference. As a matter of fact, you could put the ball on the ground and say it has potential energy, it just won't do you a lot of good, because it isn't likely to fall then.

Toneboy, in my view, internal and external forces are almost the same thing, it's just a matter of where you put the boundaries of your system.

As a real humdinger to get you exploring these concepts, take Newton's Third Law of action/reaction pairs. How, if this is true, can there ever be an external force?
 
Am I looking at these... gravitational potential energy and work stuff all wrong?

Looks ok to me.

What Denver said. You can't talk about the energy of the ball without reference to a system boundary. When you talk about the ball having KE = 0.5mV^2 the velocity term implies a system boundary. For example one that allowed you to ignore the fact that the Earth is spinning and orbiting the sun.

We draw system boundaries all the time without really thinking about it. For example when looking at conservation of energy for a light bulb we worry about the amount of electricity going in and light and heat coming out. We ignore the fact that the light bulb has gained PE when we fixed it to the ceiling.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 77 ·
3
Replies
77
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 54 ·
2
Replies
54
Views
6K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
11K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K