Conservation of Energy in a System of Three Balls and Two Pulleys

  • Thread starter Thread starter Nexus99
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Balls Pulleys
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of energy in a system involving three masses and two pulleys. Participants are analyzing the potential and kinetic energy changes as the masses move, questioning the assumptions made about their velocities and energy contributions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the conservation of energy equations, questioning the treatment of potential and kinetic energy. There are discussions about the relationship between the speeds of the masses and the assumptions regarding their velocities as one mass descends.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with various interpretations being explored. Some participants have offered guidance on the relationships between the velocities of the masses, while others are attempting to clarify their understanding of the energy equations involved.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the correct treatment of kinetic energy and the geometric relationships between the masses. Participants are also addressing potential oversights in their calculations and assumptions about the system's dynamics.

Nexus99
Messages
103
Reaction score
9
Homework Statement
Two balls of mass m are bounded by two wires of equal lenght to a third ball of mass 2m.
The wire passes on two pulleys, that are distant 2l. The ball of mass 2m, initially firm at the same
height of the pulleys and at the same distance from them, is dropped until it reaches the floor, distant h from the initial height. Which is its velocity in that moment?
Relevant Equations
Conservation of energy
Cattura.PNG

i tried with conservation of energy.

##E_i = 0 ##
##E_f = 2 m v^2 - 2mgh - 2mg(\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - l) ##
## v = \sqrt{g(h - l + \sqrt{h^2 + l^2})} ##
Is it right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The potential energy of the two masses increases, not decreases. And you left out the final kinetic energy of the two masses.
 
Chestermiller said:
The potential energy of the two masses increases, not decreases. And you left out the final kinetic energy of the two masses.
Ok so P.E of the two massese is ## 2mg(\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - l) ##
I think that kinetic energy is correct:
## \frac{1}{2} 2m v^2 + 2 \frac{1}{2} mv^2 = 2mv^2 ## is it ok?
 
Nexus99 said:
Ok so P.E of the two massese is ## 2mg(\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - l) ##
I think that kinetic energy is correct:
## \frac{1}{2} 2m v^2 + 2 \frac{1}{2} mv^2 = 2mv^2 ## is it ok?
You've assumed that all three masses have the same speed when the middle mass reaches the floor.
 
TSny said:
You've assumed that all three masses have the same speed when the middle mass reaches the floor.
I thought so, which is the relationship between the speeds?
 
Nexus99 said:
I thought so, which is the relationship between the speeds?
The middle mass has a velocity that is vertically downward. This velocity has components parallel and perpendicular to the portion of the string on the left that runs from the pulley to the middle mass.
 
So, ##v_{//_{2m}} = - v_m ## ?
I tried also a new approach
## v_{2m} = \dot{h} ##
## v_{m} = \frac{d}{dt} (\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - l) = \dot{h} \frac{h}{\sqrt{h^2 + l^2}} ##
##0 = m(\dot{h} \frac{h}{\sqrt{h^2 + l^2}})^2 + m \dot{h}^2 - 2mgh + 2mg(\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - l)##
## \dot{h} = \sqrt{[\frac{2g(h+l - \sqrt{h^2 + l^2}}{2h^2 + l^2}](h^2 + l^2)} ##

Is it right?
 
Last edited:
Nexus99 said:
Ok so P.E of the two massese is ## 2mg(\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - l) ##
I think that kinetic energy is correct:
## \frac{1}{2} 2m v^2 + 2 \frac{1}{2} mv^2 = 2mv^2 ## is it ok?
No. The velocity of the two m masses is not equal to the velocity of the 2m mass. There is a geometric factor.
 
Nexus99 said:
So, ##v_{//_{2m}} = - v_m ## ?
I tried also a new approach
## v_{2m} = \dot{h} ##
## v_{m} = \frac{d}{dh} (\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - h) = \dot{h} \frac{h}{\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - h} ##
##0 = m(\dot{h} \frac{h}{\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - h})^2 + m \dot{h}^2 - 2mgh + 2mg(\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - l)##
## \dot{h} = \sqrt{[\frac{2g(h+l - \sqrt{h^2 + l^2}}{2h^2 + l^2}](h^2 + l^2)} ##

Is it right?
All looks good to me.
 
  • #10
Nexus99 said:
So, ##v_{//_{2m}} = - v_m ## ?
I tried also a new approach
## v_{2m} = \dot{h} ##
## v_{m} = \frac{d}{dh} (\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - h) = \dot{h} \frac{h}{\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - h} ##
##0 = m(\dot{h} \frac{h}{\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - h})^2 + m \dot{h}^2 - 2mgh + 2mg(\sqrt{h^2 + l^2} - l)##
## \dot{h} = \sqrt{[\frac{2g(h+l - \sqrt{h^2 + l^2}}{2h^2 + l^2}](h^2 + l^2)} ##

Is it right?
No. If ##L=\sqrt{h^2+l^2}##, the velocity of the 1m masses is dL/dt.
 
  • #11
Chestermiller said:
No. If ##L=\sqrt{h^2+l^2}##, the velocity of the 1m masses is dL/dt.
Yes, sorry i derived dt but i wrote dh
 
  • #12
Chestermiller said:
No. If ##L=\sqrt{h^2+l^2}##, the velocity of the 1m masses is dL/dt.
Yes, I didn't catch that. Thanks. Looks like the final answer is correct.
 

Similar threads

Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
55
Views
6K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
34
Views
3K