Conservation of energy in rotating bodies

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on the conservation of energy in rotating bodies, specifically addressing the kinetic energy (KE) calculation for a cylinder in motion. The correct formula for the KE of the cylinder is derived from its center of mass (COM) velocity, where KE is expressed as 1/2mv^2. The error arises from incorrectly assuming the cylinder rotates about its center rather than the point of contact with the step. The analysis emphasizes the importance of understanding the motion of the COM and applying energy conservation principles correctly.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinetic energy equations, specifically 1/2mv^2 and 1/2Iw^2.
  • Familiarity with the parallel axis theorem and its application in rotational dynamics.
  • Knowledge of energy conservation principles in mechanics.
  • Basic understanding of forces acting on rotating bodies, including centripetal force.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of the parallel axis theorem in rotational motion.
  • Learn about energy conservation in non-linear motion scenarios.
  • Explore the dynamics of rigid bodies in contact with surfaces, focusing on points of contact.
  • Investigate the effects of different forces acting on rotating bodies, including normal and frictional forces.
USEFUL FOR

Physics students, mechanical engineers, and anyone interested in the principles of rotational dynamics and energy conservation in mechanical systems.

phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Screenshot 2021-03-01 at 2.29.09 AM.png


The conservation of energy equation is basically GPE is converted to KE of block and KE of cylinder.

To get the correct answer, the KE of the cylinder is 1/2mv^2, where m is its mass and v is the velocity of its COM (which is the centre of cylinder).
However, I viewed the cylinder as rotating about the point of contact with the step, and thus thought that its KE was 1/2Iw^2, where I = 3/2mr^2 (by parallel axis theorem), and rw = v, where v is the velocity of the centre of mass.

Why is my calculation of KE for the cylinder wrong?

Thank you for your help.

This problem can be found in Jaan Kalda's Mechanics problems, or in SS Krotov's Aptitude Test Problems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phantomvommand said:
Summary:: Why is the kinetic energy I ascribe to the cylinder in the following question wrong?

Why is my calculation of KE for the cylinder wrong?
Because the cylinder is not rotating.
 
phantomvommand said:
I viewed the cylinder as rotating about the point of contact with the step
Why about this contact and not the other one? Why rotating at all?
 
as they above say your work is wrong, but u have some ok intuition. cylinder not rotate about its mass centre, however the mass centre point do rotate in circular arc about the contact point on right (well, so long as it is still contact!). this you can use to advantage! say, mass centre of cylinder has rotate by ##\theta## about right point of contact. let ##v = |\underline{v}|## be speed of the mass centre. can first use the energy conserve$$2gr(1-\cos{\theta}) = v^2$$now, remember that mass centre move as if it were particle which is act upon by resultant force, so you now pretend mass centre is a particle, and resolve resultant of force toward right contact point (i.e. you calculate centripetal component):$$-N + mg\cos{\theta} + N_2 \sin{2\theta} = \frac{mv^2}{r}$$where ##N## is force of contact from right point, and ##N_2## force of contact from left point. now you must do examine cases when ##N = 0## and ##N_2 = 0## respective, i.e. set each to ##0## in turn and use two equation to eliminate ##v##, and find ##\theta_{\text{max}}## for each. then you can tell, which lose contact first.

see - much more easy than do use lot of messy coordinate and difficult equation, yes ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K