Conservation of energy in rotating bodies

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on the conservation of energy in a system involving a cylinder and a block, highlighting the conversion of gravitational potential energy (GPE) to kinetic energy (KE). The initial calculation of the cylinder's KE using the formula 1/2mv^2 is challenged, as the cylinder is not rotating about its center of mass but rather about the point of contact with the step. It is clarified that the correct approach involves treating the mass center of the cylinder as a particle moving in a circular arc around the contact point. The conversation emphasizes the importance of considering the forces acting on the cylinder and resolving them to analyze the motion accurately. The discussion concludes that using energy conservation principles can simplify the problem without resorting to complex equations.
phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Screenshot 2021-03-01 at 2.29.09 AM.png


The conservation of energy equation is basically GPE is converted to KE of block and KE of cylinder.

To get the correct answer, the KE of the cylinder is 1/2mv^2, where m is its mass and v is the velocity of its COM (which is the centre of cylinder).
However, I viewed the cylinder as rotating about the point of contact with the step, and thus thought that its KE was 1/2Iw^2, where I = 3/2mr^2 (by parallel axis theorem), and rw = v, where v is the velocity of the centre of mass.

Why is my calculation of KE for the cylinder wrong?

Thank you for your help.

This problem can be found in Jaan Kalda's Mechanics problems, or in SS Krotov's Aptitude Test Problems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phantomvommand said:
Summary:: Why is the kinetic energy I ascribe to the cylinder in the following question wrong?

Why is my calculation of KE for the cylinder wrong?
Because the cylinder is not rotating.
 
phantomvommand said:
I viewed the cylinder as rotating about the point of contact with the step
Why about this contact and not the other one? Why rotating at all?
 
as they above say your work is wrong, but u have some ok intuition. cylinder not rotate about its mass centre, however the mass centre point do rotate in circular arc about the contact point on right (well, so long as it is still contact!). this you can use to advantage! say, mass centre of cylinder has rotate by ##\theta## about right point of contact. let ##v = |\underline{v}|## be speed of the mass centre. can first use the energy conserve$$2gr(1-\cos{\theta}) = v^2$$now, remember that mass centre move as if it were particle which is act upon by resultant force, so you now pretend mass centre is a particle, and resolve resultant of force toward right contact point (i.e. you calculate centripetal component):$$-N + mg\cos{\theta} + N_2 \sin{2\theta} = \frac{mv^2}{r}$$where ##N## is force of contact from right point, and ##N_2## force of contact from left point. now you must do examine cases when ##N = 0## and ##N_2 = 0## respective, i.e. set each to ##0## in turn and use two equation to eliminate ##v##, and find ##\theta_{\text{max}}## for each. then you can tell, which lose contact first.

see - much more easy than do use lot of messy coordinate and difficult equation, yes ;)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Let there be a person in a not yet optimally designed sled at h meters in height. Let this sled free fall but user can steer by tilting their body weight in the sled or by optimal sled shape design point it in some horizontal direction where it is wanted to go - in any horizontal direction but once picked fixed. How to calculate horizontal distance d achievable as function of height h. Thus what is f(h) = d. Put another way, imagine a helicopter rises to a height h, but then shuts off all...
Back
Top