Conservation of energy in rotating bodies

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the conservation of energy in the context of a rotating cylinder and its kinetic energy calculations. Participants explore the relationship between gravitational potential energy (GPE) and kinetic energy (KE) in a scenario involving a cylinder in contact with a step, examining different perspectives on the cylinder's motion and energy transformations.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant asserts that the conservation of energy equation involves GPE being converted to the KE of both a block and a cylinder, questioning the calculation of KE for the cylinder.
  • Another participant suggests that the cylinder is not rotating, implying that the initial calculation of KE is incorrect.
  • A participant questions the choice of the point about which the cylinder is considered to be rotating, asking why it is not rotating about its center of mass.
  • Another response indicates that while the initial work may be flawed, there is some intuition present. They describe the motion of the cylinder's center of mass as rotating in a circular arc about the contact point, proposing a method to analyze the problem using energy conservation and forces acting on the mass center.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the rotation of the cylinder and the validity of the initial kinetic energy calculations. There is no consensus on the correct approach or the nature of the cylinder's motion.

Contextual Notes

Participants reference specific equations and conditions related to the forces acting on the cylinder and its center of mass, but the discussion does not resolve the assumptions regarding the cylinder's rotation or the conditions under which contact is maintained.

phantomvommand
Messages
287
Reaction score
39
Screenshot 2021-03-01 at 2.29.09 AM.png


The conservation of energy equation is basically GPE is converted to KE of block and KE of cylinder.

To get the correct answer, the KE of the cylinder is 1/2mv^2, where m is its mass and v is the velocity of its COM (which is the centre of cylinder).
However, I viewed the cylinder as rotating about the point of contact with the step, and thus thought that its KE was 1/2Iw^2, where I = 3/2mr^2 (by parallel axis theorem), and rw = v, where v is the velocity of the centre of mass.

Why is my calculation of KE for the cylinder wrong?

Thank you for your help.

This problem can be found in Jaan Kalda's Mechanics problems, or in SS Krotov's Aptitude Test Problems.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
phantomvommand said:
Summary:: Why is the kinetic energy I ascribe to the cylinder in the following question wrong?

Why is my calculation of KE for the cylinder wrong?
Because the cylinder is not rotating.
 
phantomvommand said:
I viewed the cylinder as rotating about the point of contact with the step
Why about this contact and not the other one? Why rotating at all?
 
as they above say your work is wrong, but u have some ok intuition. cylinder not rotate about its mass centre, however the mass centre point do rotate in circular arc about the contact point on right (well, so long as it is still contact!). this you can use to advantage! say, mass centre of cylinder has rotate by ##\theta## about right point of contact. let ##v = |\underline{v}|## be speed of the mass centre. can first use the energy conserve$$2gr(1-\cos{\theta}) = v^2$$now, remember that mass centre move as if it were particle which is act upon by resultant force, so you now pretend mass centre is a particle, and resolve resultant of force toward right contact point (i.e. you calculate centripetal component):$$-N + mg\cos{\theta} + N_2 \sin{2\theta} = \frac{mv^2}{r}$$where ##N## is force of contact from right point, and ##N_2## force of contact from left point. now you must do examine cases when ##N = 0## and ##N_2 = 0## respective, i.e. set each to ##0## in turn and use two equation to eliminate ##v##, and find ##\theta_{\text{max}}## for each. then you can tell, which lose contact first.

see - much more easy than do use lot of messy coordinate and difficult equation, yes ;)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
3K
  • · Replies 53 ·
2
Replies
53
Views
5K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K