Conservation of Energy (Kinetic and Potential Energies)

AI Thread Summary
A 5.00-kg block moves up an inclined plane at a 30° angle with an initial speed of 8.00 m/s and comes to rest after 3.00 m. The change in kinetic energy is calculated to be 160 J, while the change in potential energy is 73.5 J, indicating that mechanical energy is not conserved due to friction. The work done by friction is determined to be 86.5 J, leading to a frictional force of approximately 28.8 N. The calculations highlight the relationship between kinetic and potential energy changes and the impact of friction on the system. Understanding these concepts is crucial for solving similar physics problems.
Pappers08
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A 5.00-kg block is set into motion up an inclined plane with an initial speed of 8.00 m/s. The block comes to rest after traveling 3.00m along the plane, which is inclined at an angle of 30° to the horizontal. For this motion, find the change in the block's kinetic energy, the change in the block's potential energy, the frictional force exerted on it, and the coefficient of kinetic energy.


Homework Equations


W= F*d
PE= mgh
KE= 1/2m(v squared)
Fnet=ma

The Attempt at a Solution


I haven't attempted it yet, because I'm stuck on how to start it. I missed the day of school we started going over this.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since the block comes to rest, it looses all of it's kinetic energy. So the change will be equal to the initial kinetic energy mv2/2 .
The change in potential energy is mgΔh , where Δh is the change of height.That would be Δh = 3m sinθ.
When you do the above calculations you will see that the change in kinetic energy is not the same as the changde in potential energy. It looks like mechanical energy is not conserved, but that's because there is friction. The difference between change in kinetic energy and change in potential energy will be the work of friction. Find this difference and, since W = F Δx, the friction's will force will be W/Δx , where Δx = 3m
 
cosmic dust said:
Since the block comes to rest, it looses all of it's kinetic energy. So the change will be equal to the initial kinetic energy mv2/2 .
The change in potential energy is mgΔh , where Δh is the change of height.That would be Δh = 3m sinθ.
When you do the above calculations you will see that the change in kinetic energy is not the same as the changde in potential energy. It looks like mechanical energy is not conserved, but that's because there is friction. The difference between change in kinetic energy and change in potential energy will be the work of friction. Find this difference and, since W = F Δx, the friction's will force will be W/Δx , where Δx = 3m

So according to this, the block's kinetic energy would be 160J...the block's potential energy would be 73.5J...the frictional force would be 86.5N?
 
Pappers08 said:
So according to this, the block's kinetic energy would be 160J...the block's potential energy would be 73.5J...the frictional force would be 86.5N?

86.5 J is the work of friction. The force will be 87.6J/3m = 28.8 N
 
Okay thanks! That really helps!
 
Thread 'Voltmeter readings for this circuit with switches'
TL;DR Summary: I would like to know the voltmeter readings on the two resistors separately in the picture in the following cases , When one of the keys is closed When both of them are opened (Knowing that the battery has negligible internal resistance) My thoughts for the first case , one of them must be 12 volt while the other is 0 The second case we'll I think both voltmeter readings should be 12 volt since they are both parallel to the battery and they involve the key within what the...
Thread 'Struggling to make relation between elastic force and height'
Hello guys this is what I tried so far. I used the UTS to calculate the force it needs when the rope tears. My idea was to make a relationship/ function that would give me the force depending on height. Yeah i couldnt find a way to solve it. I also thought about how I could use hooks law (how it was given to me in my script) with the thought of instead of having two part of a rope id have one singular rope from the middle to the top where I could find the difference in height. But the...
Back
Top