Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

Conservation of mass and energy

  1. Oct 26, 2013 #1
    Hmm, I
    s matter always conserved?
    Is mass always conserved?
    Is rest-mass always conserved?
    Is energy always conserved?

    are there any exceptions?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Oct 26, 2013 #2

    UltrafastPED

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    No - matter/anti-matter annihilation and creation.

    No ... see above.

    No ... you can change the rest mass of a pile of potatoes by heating them.

    Yes - but you need to take into account all forms of energy, and transformations such as E=mc^2.
    With the possible exception of General Relativity ... but if GR does not apply then energy is conserved.
     
    Last edited: Oct 26, 2013
  4. Oct 26, 2013 #3

    Bandersnatch

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

  5. Oct 30, 2013 #4

    I just found that mass is conserved because mass equals energy divided by c^2, and energy is always conserved, no?
     
  6. Oct 30, 2013 #5

    ZapperZ

    User Avatar
    Staff Emeritus
    Science Advisor
    Education Advisor
    2016 Award

    The more general conservation law here is the conservation of mass-energy, not just mass, not just energy.

    Zz.
     
  7. Oct 30, 2013 #6

    UltrafastPED

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    Gold Member

    No - mass has energy, but energy does not necessarily have mass.

    For example, light has no mass, but does have energy.

    Nor does kinetic energy contribute to the mass:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Energy–momentum_relation
     
  8. Oct 30, 2013 #7
    The OP asked if mass is conserved and if rest mass is conserved. Mass is often taken to mean the same thing as rest mass, but in this context, you could also interpret mass to mean invariant mass. Rest-mass is not conserved because of particle creation/annihilation, but invariant mass is conserved (at least, not counting any general relativity weirdness). This is because a pair of photons traveling in opposite directions has a combined invariant mass.

    In fact, invariant mass is independent of observer frame, so I think it should be conserved even in GR, since the problems of parallel transport do not apply.
     
    Last edited: Oct 30, 2013
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook