Dismiss Notice
Join Physics Forums Today!
The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

I Conservation of Momentum in Classical Field Theory

  1. Mar 27, 2017 #1
    In classical field theory, translational (in space and time) symmetry leads the derivation of the energy-momentum tensor using Noether's theorem.

    From this it is possible to derive four conserved charges. The first turns out to be the Hamiltonian, and thus we have energy conservation.

    The remaining three turn out to be
    Pi=-∫d3aiφa
    where φa are fields and πa are their conjugate momentum densities. It is often stated that these are the three (physical) momentum components, and so we have conservation of momentum. Is there an easy way to see that this is true?
     
  2. jcsd
  3. Mar 27, 2017 #2

    samalkhaiat

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    If you are asking to prove that [itex]\frac{d}{dt}P^{i} = 0[/itex] , then the answer to your question is an easy yes. Translation invariance means that the Lagrangian, [itex]\mathcal{L}(\varphi_{a},\dot{\varphi}_{a},\partial_{k}\varphi_{a})[/itex] , has no explicit [itex]x^{k}[/itex]-dependence, i.e., [itex]\partial^{i}\mathcal{L} = 0[/itex] . This implies that [tex]\int d^{3}x \ \partial^{i}\mathcal{L} = 0 .[/tex]

    The rest is just algebra: Calculate [itex]\partial^{i}\mathcal{L}[/itex] and use the equation of motion to obtain

    [tex]0 = \int d^{3}x \ \partial^{i}\mathcal{L} = \frac{d}{dt} \int d^{3}x \ \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \dot{\varphi_{a}}} \ \partial^{i}\varphi_{a} + \int d^{3}x \ \partial_{k}\left( \frac{\partial \mathcal{L}}{\partial \partial_{k} \varphi_{a}} \ \partial^{i}\varphi_{a}\right) .[/tex] The second term vanishes by the divergence theorem, and the first term is just [itex]\frac{d}{dt}P^{i}[/itex].
     
  4. Mar 27, 2017 #3
    I'm happy that this quantity is conserved - It just isn't very clear that it is in fact the momentum.
     
  5. Mar 27, 2017 #4

    samalkhaiat

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor

    Then you should consider some concrete Lagrangians (for example the Lagrangian of electromagnetic, long elastic rod, sound wave, etc.). Or you can use the argument of relativistic covariance.
     
  6. Mar 28, 2017 #5

    vanhees71

    User Avatar
    Science Advisor
    2016 Award

    Well, it's momentum by definition, because the conserved quantity that's conserved because of spatial translations is called momentum (as for temporal translations it's called energy).
     
Know someone interested in this topic? Share this thread via Reddit, Google+, Twitter, or Facebook

Have something to add?
Draft saved Draft deleted