Conserved quantity due to invariance under temporal rotations

  • I
  • Thread starter Marty4691
  • Start date
  • #1
17
1
Hi,

I was looking at the so(3,3) Lie algebra which has 3 temporal rotation generators as well as the normal 3 spatial rotation generators. When I try to use Noether's Theorem to determine what the conserved quantity is, due to invariance under temporal rotations, I seem to get an integral where the integrand is of the form

[(energy)*(time) - (energy)*(time)]

The equivalent integrand corresponding to spatial rotations is

[(momentum)*(distance) - (momentum)*(distance)]

which is normal because the conserved quantity turns out to be angular momentum. But (energy)*(time) has the same units as angular momentum which seems to imply that invariance under temporal rotations and invariance under spatial rotations both lead to conserved quantities with the units of Planck's constant. I'm not sure if this can be right.

My calculations are on the back of an envelope so I was hoping that someone might know if this is correct or if there is a paper that deals more rigorously with this question.

Thanks.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Orodruin
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
16,829
6,652
But (energy)*(time) has the same units as angular momentum which seems to imply that invariance under temporal rotations and invariance under spatial rotations both lead to conserved quantities with the units of Planck's constant. I'm not sure if this can be right.
Why would this be an issue?
 
  • #3
17
1
In the context of so(3,3), if the above is correct then there might be a second type of "spinor" representation. The normal spinor representation has the form

{(J+iK), (J+iK), (J+iK)}

where the Js are spatial rotation generators and the Ks are boost generators. The second type of representation would have the form

{(T+iK), (T+iK), (T+iK)}

where the Ts are temporal rotation generators.

It might open the door to an additional mathematical description for a spin 1/2 particle.
 

Related Threads on Conserved quantity due to invariance under temporal rotations

Replies
11
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
680
Replies
1
Views
695
Replies
6
Views
816
Top