Conserved quantities in the cart and pendulum problem

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on deriving the Lagrangian for a cart-pendulum system, where a cart of mass m1 moves frictionlessly along the x-axis and a mass m2 is suspended from it. The user successfully derived the Lagrangian and the Euler-Lagrange equations for both x and the angle phi. The conversation highlights the importance of continuous symmetries in the problem, specifically noting that the absence of x in the Lagrangian indicates conservation of momentum in the x-direction, as confirmed by the application of Noether's theorem.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Lagrangian mechanics
  • Familiarity with Euler-Lagrange equations
  • Knowledge of Noether's theorem
  • Basic concepts of momentum conservation
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the Lagrangian for complex mechanical systems
  • Explore applications of Noether's theorem in various physical systems
  • Learn about momentum conservation in non-conservative systems
  • Investigate the implications of symmetry in classical mechanics
USEFUL FOR

Students and researchers in physics, particularly those focusing on classical mechanics, Lagrangian dynamics, and the application of symmetry principles in physical systems.

ct1993
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
A problem on an assignment I'm doing deals with a cart of mass m1 which can slide frictionlessly along the x-axis. Suspended from the cart by a string of length l is a mass m2, which is constrained to move in the x-y plane. The angle between the pendulum and vertical is notated as phi. The question asks me to first derive the Lagrangian for the system which I got as:

upload_2015-2-10_4-24-11.png


It then asks me to find any continuous symmetrys in the problem and the corresponding conserved quantities. I found the Euler-Lagrange equations for x:

upload_2015-2-10_4-24-11.png


and for phi:

upload_2015-2-10_4-24-11.png


From the E-L equation for x, I know that:

upload_2015-2-10_4-24-11.png


Which I believe indicates the momentum in the x-direction is conserved, but I'm not sure. I think I'm supposed to do this with some application of Noether theorem, which was supposed to be covered today, but class was canceled due to snow and the assignment is still due Wednesday. Can anyone help me?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hello ct, welcome to PF. :)

Something went wrong with the template: it shows up when you start a thread but now it's gone for some inexplicable (?) reason. Not good, because its use is mandatory in PF -- for good reasons !

Anyway, your post is quite extensive and merits a response. Symmetry is incredibly important in physics. Did you notice that in your Lagrangian there is no x (that's why the template is so important: I can guess what your x stands for, but misunderstandings are lurking just around the corner. Thousands of examples in PF, all a waste of time, goodwill, energy and what else :) ).

There is ##\ddot x##, but ##L## is invariant under a change of coordinate x (I mean a coordinate transformation: picking a different origin). That means momentum conservation (Emmy N's theorem is a fancy way of deriving that -- "the canonical momentum associated with x, ##\partial L\over \partial \dot x\ ##"). As you show.

I think you did just fine.
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 32 ·
2
Replies
32
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
10K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K