Consider the hypothetical decay of the Φ(1020) meson into 3 pions

manfromearth
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Consider the hypothetical decay of the ##\phi(1020)## meson into ##\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}##. Is This decay possible?
Relevant Equations
$$\phi(1020) \rightarrow \pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}$$
$$J^{PC}(\phi)=1^{--}, J^{P}(\pi^{\pm})=0^{-}, J^{PC}(\pi^{0})=0^{-+}$$
I started checking for angular momentum conservation.
The initial state has ##J_{in}=S_{\phi}=1##. The pions in the final state all have 0 spin, so the total angular momentum in the final state comes only from orbital momentum. Call ##L_{\pm}## the orbital momentum of the charged pions orbiting each other, ##L_{(\pm)0}## the orbital angular momentum of the system of charged pions rotating around the neutral pion. So, the final state has ##J_{fin} = L_{(\pm)0} + L_{\pm}##.
Angular momentum conservation requires ##J_{in}=J_{fin}##. So:

##1=J_{fin} = L_{(\pm)0} + L_{\pm}##

So i start combining integer angular momenta with the usual rules, and look what combinations give me a total angular momenta of ##J_{fin}=1##.
Adding the momenta ##L_{(\pm)0}## and ##L_{(\pm)}## i get possible ##J_{fin}## going from ##L_{(\pm)0}+L_{(\pm)}## to ##|L_{(\pm)0}-L_{(\pm)}|##. Doing this for some values i get the following table:
addition of momenta.jpg

What I get from this is that, for example, looking at the 2nd row: i can satisfy angular momentum conservation with ##L_{\pm}## an even number and ##L_{(\pm)0}## odd. Looking at other rows in the table that have ##J_{fin}=1## as possible values, I see that in general momentum conservation can be satisfied with whatever parity for ##L_{\pm}## and ##L_{(\pm)0}##: One can be odd, the other even or also Even-Even or Odd-Odd.


Now i Apply Parity conservation and Charge conjugation conservation.
Parity conservation: $$P(\phi)=-1,\quad P(\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0})=P(\pi^{+}\pi^{-})P(\pi^{0})=(-1)^{L_{\pm}}(+1)(-1)^{L_{(\pm)0}} $$
Charge conjugation conservation: $$C(\phi)=-1,\quad C(\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0})=C(\pi^{+}\pi^{-})C(\pi^{0})=(-1)^{L_{\pm}}(+1)$$

From this i see that: to preserve parity i must have one of the L odd, the other even. To preserve Charge conjugation i must have ##L_{\pm}## odd. Since i can choose the evenness/oddness of Ls as i want and still conserve angular momentum, i can pick ##L_{\pm}## to be odd and ##L_{(\pm)0}## even. This will conserve P,C,J and i would conclude that:

The proposed decay does not violate P,C,J conservation and is therefore possible.


Is this the right way to proceed? Am i missing something? I have seen examples of a scalar particle decaying into 3 scalar products but never one with a spin 1 decaying into 3 spin 0.
 

Attachments

  • addition of momenta.jpg
    addition of momenta.jpg
    22.8 KB · Views: 53
Physics news on Phys.org
Look it up in Wikipedia. Particle physicists at the 60's were surprised by the results of the experiments.
 
JimWhoKnew said:
Look it up in Wikipedia. Particle physicists at the 60's were surprised by the results of the experiments.
What do you mean? what should i look for exactly?
 
It turns out (empirically) that if a certain decay is allowed by the theory, then it MUST also occur in the lab with some branching ratio. So, is the ##\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}
## an experimentally observed decay channel of the Phi meson? Wikipedia (and other websites) can answer that.

BTW (1), if I had to submit this assignment myself, I would have started by mentioning that the decay is compatible with energy and momentum conservation.

BTW (2) I didn't fully check all the details in your reasoning.
 
JimWhoKnew said:
It turns out (empirically) that if a certain decay is allowed by the theory, then it MUST also occur in the lab with some branching ratio. So, is the ##\pi^{+}\pi^{-}\pi^{0}
## an experimentally observed decay channel of the Phi meson? Wikipedia (and other websites) can answer that.

BTW (1), if I had to submit this assignment myself, I would have started by mentioning that the decay is compatible with energy and momentum conservation.

BTW (2) I didn't fully check all the details in your reasoning.
I know the process it's possible. It's listed in the PDG:
https://pdglive.lbl.gov/BranchingRatio.action?pdgid=M004.3&home=MXXX005

But this can only be considered a consistency check. What i would like to know is if the solution I proposed makes sense, and if not, a guide on how to solve it. About conservation of momentum and energy: thank you for pointing that up. I had checked that but choose not to include it in the post.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top