Considering a Busy Course Load for Next Semester: A Student's Dilemma

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around a student's consideration of their course load for the next semester, which includes advanced physics, mathematics, and a philosophy class. Participants explore the feasibility of managing this workload, the potential impact on learning, and the importance of prior knowledge in related subjects.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Exploratory

Main Points Raised

  • The student is currently enrolled in several challenging courses and is contemplating adding more for the next semester, raising questions about manageability and time availability.
  • Some participants suggest that the student's advisor's input is crucial, as they can provide insights tailored to the student's specific situation and the courses involved.
  • Concerns are raised about the variability in course content and teaching styles, particularly regarding E&M II and Linear Algebra, which could affect the student's preparedness for Abstract Algebra.
  • One participant notes that their learning style favors a smaller number of courses, while others argue that some students thrive under heavier loads.
  • There is a caution against underestimating the time commitment required for non-STEM courses, such as philosophy, which may involve significant writing and memorization.
  • Questions are posed about the benefits of taking an additional course, considering potential stress and the impact on learning quality.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the appropriateness of the proposed course load, with no consensus on whether it is advisable to take six classes. Some emphasize the importance of personal learning styles and past experiences, while others highlight the risks of increased difficulty and stress.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the effectiveness of the course load may depend on individual learning preferences, the specific syllabi of the courses, and the teaching styles of the instructors. There is also mention of the variability in content and expectations across different Linear Algebra courses.

Who May Find This Useful

Students considering similar course loads in STEM fields, particularly those balancing advanced physics and mathematics with non-STEM subjects, may find this discussion relevant.

ASZarathustra
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
So I recently signed up for classes this semester, and have everything down except one class. This semester, I'm taking modern physics, electricity and magnetism, differential equations, intro to advanced math (essentially an intro to proof class, along with a little basic set theory), and logic. I currently have A's in all those classes except for E&M (depends on the curve; although at the lowest, I have a B).

For next semester, I want to take classical mechanics, E&M II, thermodynamics, lab (it's the first lab class for majors), abstract algebra I, and philosophy of mind (I do want to take something that's not physics or math, and I don't anticipate this being an overly demanding class).

So, my question is, is this a doable course load? If so, will I have any time at the end of the day?

Information that may help:

I haven't taken linear algebra yet. Should I wait on abstract algebra then? (I plan on taking it in the summer to lighten the load a little bit; abstract algebra isn't offered in the summer).
E&M II is not a required class, but I want to take it, and I don't know if they'll offer it next spring (the physics department rotates higher level classes at random; for all intents and purposes, I don't expect them to offer it next spring). Should I take the time to take it?
How hard and time-consuming are each of the physics classes listed?

Thanks in advance to all who answer.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
What does your advisor think of this plan?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
What does your advisor think of this plan?

He was the first person I asked. All he said was that it depended on myself and how much I could handle. I guess I just answered my own question, but I would like a solid answer.
 
ASZarathustra said:
I guess I just answered my own question, but I would like a solid answer.
I don't think there is a sold answer.
In my experience it depends on an lot of things. This would include whether each lecturers teaching style matches how I personally learn best. Timetabling eg if I have three consecutive hours of lectures then the third hour is pretty much a write off in terms of information absorbed. Mainly, it depends on whether I have an intuitive grasp on the subject.
 
ASZarathustra said:
I would like a solid answer.

I don't think there is a solid answer. How long is a piece of string?
 
Vanadium 50 said:
I don't think there is a solid answer. How long is a piece of string?

Alright. Could you at least answer the first two questions I made at the bottom (disregard the last one, as billy_joule made a good point)? That might help me decide quicker.
 
The problem is that "E&M II" doesn't tell us what the class syllabus is, or what you were taught in E&M I, or what the mathematical expectations are. Similarly, Linear Algebra has a lot of variation - my class was largely proof-based and would have been helpful bnefore Abstract. Others I know too classes that focused on numerical methods, and would have been of little help for Abstract. That's why I tried to point you to your advisor - he knows these things. We would be guessing.
 
Vanadium 50 said:
The problem is that "E&M II" doesn't tell us what the class syllabus is, or what you were taught in E&M I, or what the mathematical expectations are. Similarly, Linear Algebra has a lot of variation - my class was largely proof-based and would have been helpful bnefore Abstract. Others I know too classes that focused on numerical methods, and would have been of little help for Abstract. That's why I tried to point you to your advisor - he knows these things. We would be guessing.

(This description goes by Griffith's book, if that helps) E&M I covers electrostatics, electric fields in matter, magnetostatics, electrodynamics (i.e. emf and inductions), conservation laws (i.e. Poynting vecotr), and electromagnetic waves. E&M II will cover potentials and fields, radiation, and relativistic electrodynamics, as well as a little introductory plasma material. Linear algebra, from what I understand, is half computation (matrices and determinants), and half "proof"-like (vector spaces, linear transformations, orthogonality, and eigenvalues, although I don't know how much each topic here is weighted).
 
What has worked well for you in the past in terms of course load. I personally learn the most when I can focus on a small number of things. In theory this might mean I learn less overall. But if you focus on a topic you tend to pick up a bunch of generally useful things. As an example studying numerical PDE leads to some graph theory, learning measure theory might lead you to Ordinal numbers if you think about the Borel Hierarchy.

On the other hand many people learn more when they take high class loads. You should choose the course load that has, in the past, lead to maximal learning for you.
 
  • #10
deluks917 said:
What has worked well for you in the past in terms of course load. I personally learn the most when I can focus on a small number of things. In theory this might mean I learn less overall. But if you focus on a topic you tend to pick up a bunch of generally useful things. As an example studying numerical PDE leads to some graph theory, learning measure theory might lead you to Ordinal numbers if you think about the Borel Hierarchy.

On the other hand many people learn more when they take high class loads. You should choose the course load that has, in the past, lead to maximal learning for you.

You see, this will have been the most I have taken. I took 4 classes (14 hours) the first semesters, and am taking 5 classes (15 hours) right now. My schedule would have 6 classes (18 hours). I'm doing fine in 5 right now, but I'm concerned about the difficulty of the classes next semester, and the jump from 5 to 6.
 
  • #11
In this case imo, it is probably not a good idea both to increase the difficulty and the number of the classes you are taking. My guess would be you are best off with CM + EM2 + thermo lab + 1 other class. But I agree you should talk to a faculty advisor.
 
  • #12
Two points:

1. Don't underestimate courses like philosophy. Even if they're easy, they can still take up a lot of your time. (Writing essays, memorizing a bunch of stuff by rote, etc.) I made this mistake once and ended up having to withdraw from the class.
2. What do you gain by taking 6 courses instead of 5? If your grades don't take a hit, you're at very least going to be more stressed. Also, even if you do well grade-wise, you still might not learn as much as you'd like to in some classes because you're juggling too many other classes. So the logical question is, what do you gain by doing extra classes? Is it worth the probable stress and reduced quality of your education?
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
41
Views
8K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 40 ·
2
Replies
40
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
6K