Constant force acting on a particle

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a constant force acting on a particle, with a focus on the trajectory of the particle and its representation in a coordinate system. The subject area includes concepts from kinematics and projectile motion.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the relationship between the equations of motion and the trajectory of the particle, with one participant attempting to derive the equation of the trajectory from given equations. There is a discussion about eliminating variables and the implications of terms in the resulting equations.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided guidance on how to eliminate variables to find the trajectory, while others express confusion regarding the presence of coupled terms in the equations. The discussion reflects a mix of attempts to clarify the mathematical relationships and explore the implications of the results.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the challenge of deriving the relationship between x and y from the equations provided, and there is mention of the implications of encountering an xy term in the context of conic sections.

Vibhor
Messages
971
Reaction score
40

Homework Statement


?temp_hash=0d547fa742474ebbdd95d96f4958c5b3.png


Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



If I consider a coordinate system with the -Y axis along the direction of force and X axis along a line perpendicular to it (except the direction of velocity vector) then this problem is equivalent to the usual projectile motion problem where a particle is projected from an elevation horizontally ( i.e velocity perpendicular to gravity ) .

So I can conclude that the path in the problem is parabolic i.e option b) which is indeed the given answer .

Now , when I tried to find the equation of trajectory , I am a bit lost .

In the usual X-Y coordinate system with 'm' representing the mass of the particle , we have ,

## x = 3t + \frac{1}{2}\frac{4}{m}t^2##

## y = 4t - \frac{1}{2}\frac{3}{m}t^2##

I am finding it difficult to solve the above equations so as to get the relation between x and y .

Any sincere help is very much appreciated .

Thanks .
 

Attachments

  • force.PNG
    force.PNG
    3 KB · Views: 625
Physics news on Phys.org
Calculate ##3x+4y## to eliminate the quadratic terms in ##t##. Then solve this for ##t## and substitute for ##t## in either ##x(t)## or ##y(t)##. You should get a parabola tilted at 45 degrees.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
blue_leaf77 said:
Calculate ##3x+4y## to eliminate the quadratic terms in ##t##. Then solve this for ##t## and substitute for ##t## in either ##x(t)## or ##y(t)##. You should get a parabola tilted at 45 degrees.

Fantastic ! :smile:

But on expanding I get a term containing ##xy## . I have never really seen an ##xy## term in the usual parabola equations .
 
Vibhor said:
Fantastic ! :smile:

But on expanding I get a term containing ##xy## . I have never really seen an ##xy## term in the usual parabola equations .
The coupled terms like that in conic sections such as parabola is an indication that this curve is rotated at an angle from ##x## or ##y## axis.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Vibhor
blue_leaf77 said:
The coupled terms like that in conic sections such as parabola is an indication that this curve is rotated at an angle from ##x## or ##y## axis.

Interesting :cool: .

Thanks a lot .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K