Constant jerk motion: acceleration vs. position

  • Context: High School 
  • Thread starter Thread starter FranzS
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving an explicit equation for acceleration (a) concerning position (s) in motion characterized by constant jerk (j). The equations governing this motion include acceleration as a function of time, velocity, and position, with initial conditions defined. The proposed method involves setting up a differential equation and integrating, but it requires solving a cubic equation for time (t) as a function of position (s). The participants confirm that using known formulas for cubic equations simplifies the process, allowing for the identification of real solutions while disregarding complex ones.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of kinematics, specifically equations of motion with constant jerk.
  • Familiarity with differential equations and integration techniques.
  • Knowledge of cubic equations and methods for solving them.
  • Basic concepts of real and complex numbers in mathematical solutions.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of kinematic equations under constant jerk conditions.
  • Learn techniques for solving cubic equations, including Cardano's method.
  • Explore differential equations and their applications in physics.
  • Investigate the implications of multiple real solutions in physical contexts.
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, mathematicians, and engineers interested in advanced motion dynamics and the mathematical modeling of motion with variable acceleration.

FranzS
Messages
86
Reaction score
26
TL;DR
How to find an equation for acceleration vs. position in a constant jerk motion?
Hi PF,

a motion with constant jerk ##j##, i.e. with a constant rate of change of the acceleration with respect to time, should be described by the following equations (hope the variable names are self-explanatory):

$$
\begin{cases}
a = a_0 + j \ t \\
v = v_0 + a_0 \ t + \frac{1}{2} \ j \ t^2 \\
s = s_0 + v_0 \ t + \frac{1}{2} \ a_0 \ t^2 + \frac{1}{6} \ j \ t^3
\end{cases}
$$

I'm interested in deriving an explicit equation for acceleration ##a## with respect to position ##s## as the only independent variable. Jerk ##j## and all initial conditions are to be considered known values.
My guess is that I should set up a differential equation of the type...
$$
\frac{da(s)}{ds}=\frac{da(t)}{dt} \cdot \frac{dt(s)}{ds}
$$
... where ##da(t)/dt=j## by definition, and then integrate both sides.
But that would mean finding ##t(s)## first, and that's solving a cubic equation.

Is my approach correct? Is there any simpler way?
Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
There's a known formula to solve a cubic. Look it up, write ##t(s)##, and plug that into your first equation. You will get either one or three real solutions. You can safely ignore complex solutions, but if you have multiple real solutions you may have to come up with a way to pick the correct one.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: FranzS
Ibix said:
There's a known formula to solve a cubic. Look it up, write ##t(s)##, and plug that into your first equation. You will get either one or three real solutions. You can safely ignore complex solutions, but if you have multiple real solutions you may have to come up with a way to pick the correct one.
How could I not see the direct substitution into the first equation... It seems like I really wanted to re-derive that one as well... My bad. Thanks for pointing it out.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Ibix

Similar threads

  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
4K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K