Constant Velocity should = Acceleration of 0m/s^2 right?

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a physics problem involving a NASCAR race car moving with constant velocity and its implications for acceleration. The subject area is kinematics, specifically focusing on the concepts of velocity, speed, and acceleration.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the definitions of velocity and speed, questioning the implications of constant velocity on acceleration. There is an attempt to clarify the distinction between these terms and their relevance to the problem presented.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing insights into the differences between speed and velocity. Some guidance has been offered regarding the implications of these definitions on the acceleration of the car, particularly in the context of circular motion.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of the original problem statement being taken verbatim, which raises questions about the interpretation of "constant velocity" in relation to the car's motion around a track.

litzkrieg
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
(a) Suppose that a NASCAR race car is moving to the right with a constant velocity of +81 m/s. What is the average acceleration of the car? (b) Twelve seconds later, the car is halfway around the track and traveling in the opposite direction with the same speed. What is the average acceleration of the car?

To me they should equal:
a) A=0 m/s^2

b) A=-0 m/s^2

It ha been awhile since i took AP physics in high school, but to my understanding a "Constant Velocity" means neither positive or negative acceleration right? I know V=Change in Distance/ change in time and Acceleration=change in velocity/changine in time but it keeps telling me I am wrong...can someone tell me what I am missing?

Thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure of the exact statement of the problem? "Velocity" is a vector quantity. If the car is moving with constant velocity, it must be moving in a straight line with constant speed. It would have 0 acceleration but that would make it impossible for it to go "around the track".

"Speed", on the other hand, is a number. It is quite possible for a car to drive around a circular track with constant speed. In that case, its acceleration is non zero and is directed toward the center of the track.

Please check to make certain the problem says "velocity" and not "speed".
 
And that's what i honestly thought to but the problem is literally copy and paste, (i don't feel bad about doing that because I am not asking for the answers to it, just trying to make sense of it)
 
Hi litzkrieg,

You're right in saying that if something has a constant velocity, then it is not experiencing any acceleration. What you need to remember is the distinction between velocity and speed; velocity has a direction (how fast are we traveling West, for example), whereas speed is just the magnitude of the velocity (e.g. speedo on a car). This means that something can have a constant speed, but change direction, but to change direction, it must experience an acceleration. So your NASCAR car might maintain speed, but it's velocity has changed a lot. Using the change in velocity, you can find the acceleration in (b).

Hope that helps!
 
Yes it did, once i understood the real difference from speed and Velocity, recalling the direction factor everything became much more clear.

Thank you Both
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 38 ·
2
Replies
38
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K